"and the evil entity Chaos, and his robot army" - to clarify, does the robot army he's looking for belong to Chaos? I'd drop the comma if that is the case.
It's Robotnik's army, not Chaos's. I've re-written it.
"Big the Cat is slow and carries a fishing rod" - to clarify, does the fishing rod do anything before the action stage?
No, it doesn't do anything until you cast it. Re-written.
"to transform into his super form and fight Chaos" - as I recall there's an appropriate article/sub-section for you to link 'super form' to
Linked.
"After Chaos is quelled, Sonic chases a fleeing Robotnik" - to clarify, the game ends with him chasing Robotnik and the player does not find out if he catches him? That's the message I'm getting from this sentence anyway.
Yeah, pretty much. I've added that the story ends on a cliffhanger.
"and the series was attributed to the success of the Genesis" - I think this point could be worded less awkwardly. Perhaps "Saturn's commercial failure. Without it, the system had no original Sonic platformer, whereas the series was attributed to the success of the Genesis."
Done.
"they placed it in Sonic Jam" - I'd give a brief description of this title and specify the year it was released
It's mentioned what Sonic Jam was in the prior paragraph.
There's never really been a full-blown consensus on whether or not CCC is reliable, it's mostly just been those who say it's reliable providing terrible arguments compared to those who think it's unreliable. This article, however, was written by Angelo D'Argenio, an author who has written for numerous sources we do consider reliable. He is (or was, in the case of the Escapist) a staff member at the Escapist, Arcade Sushi, and GameCrate, all of which are considered usable. It's only being used for attributed opinion too, not for fact.
Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addressed. P.S. I just wasted 20 minutes of my life playing Big's Big Fishing Adventure 3. :p
Freikorp (
talk)
00:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Sergecross73: I've already explained above that I think this article is usable. I'll remove it for now, but I'll re-add it if we can get to an agreement and stop edit warring with each other.
JOEBRO6400:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Sure, you explained, though not a single person has said they agree with you. It's a very weak rationale, a relatively unknown writer who wrote for borderline usable sources wrote an article for an unreliable source. Not a great argument. And don't preach about edit warring - you've reverted more than anyone.
Sergecross73msg me00:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Well the source has been removed so as it stands right now I'm satisfied the article meets GA requirements. Happy to pass it. I guess you can continue to debate about the source at the talk page. Also yes, playing Big's Fishing Adventure was worth it, but I won't exactly be playing it a second time haha :)
Freikorp (
talk)
08:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply