From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

Charles Brook deserves a page of his own. Not all his important work was done through the SHA.

Agreed.-- Johnsoniensis ( talk) 19:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Perhaps, although I'm not sure he is sufficiently notable. Regardless, the content here was excessively off-topic and so I have just removed most of it and re-jigged the remainder. Obviously, the info is still there in the history if anyone wants to gamble on a standalone biographical article. - Sitush ( talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Given the number of edits I have just had to make due to misrepresentation of sources, I think we need to try to get hold of all the offline sources and check against our statements. - Sitush ( talk) 17:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC) reply

COI tag (November 2022)

Regarding Rathfelder: See ANI discussion. -- BarleyButt ( talk) 19:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply