This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Is there another "George Dick-Lauder, 12th Baronet" - if not then this page should be called "George Dick-Lauder, 12th Baronet" and not "Sir George Dick-Lauder, 12th Baronet " - regards --
Vintagekits14:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)reply
MOS says Sir {first name unless he is better known by his second) (Surname), 12th Baronet. As you were told under Sir Henry Chamberlain, 1st Baronet. -
Kittybrewster15:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Actually the MOS isnt clear on that and Tyrenius actually disagreed with your assessment - can can the middle name be used to distingush between two memebers of the same family with similar names?--
Vintagekits15:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Even if there were two George Dick-Lauder's both use the prefix "Sir" if both were baronets. I don't understand the point of this discussion. This artcile follows Wikipedia guidelines.--
Counter-revolutionary15:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)reply
As Sir George's first son and heir was born in Cyprus and his second in Berlin (according to Debretts) during his time in the Army the presumption might be that he was transferred to those places given that he was then still in service?
David Lauder20:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply