This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Country: United States and Ukraine. Is this true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.218.96.244 ( talk) 07:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Once the film is actually released, a lot of the page is going to be deleted in order to more closely resemble the previous film's page. All of this gossip is getting the ax come next year. -- Nqnpipnr
There's some buzz floating around that it might not be realeased until 2007 [1]. If you consider that Rodriguez is working on Grindhouse right now, will he be able to finish SC2 in time for an '06 release? And not to mention all this hooplah about Angelina Jolie playing Ava and being pregnent. [2] ONEder Boy 04:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
At the minute, even if he blazed straight into it after GH hits theaters, you're still looking at an early '08 release date, maybe late '07 if he really canes it. Over half of the actual shoot schedule for the first was post-production and visual fx, and they had at least 3 fx houses working it simultaneously.
Radical AdZ
Then when it is it going to be released? Headstrong 345 13:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Headstrong 345
At the end of the Sin City (film) in the Epilogue, which is not featured in any comics, Becky is entering an elavator where The Salesman, who killed The Customer at the start of the film, he does the exact same to Becky offering her a cigarette. But then the Elavator closes and Sin City 2 could start with what happenned in the elavator straight after the Sin city Epilogue
I changed part of the page because it said that Dawson had said that Jolie was playing Ava, whereas if you read the source she only says that the director was interested in her, and was delaying the movie to correspond with her pregnancy.
--Am I the only one who thinks Angelina Jolie would be much more suited to play Mariah in Hell and Back than Ava?
The BBC website seems to have removed the September release date for Sin City 2. I went through all the months and it does not seem to be there at all. This seems to mean we have no release date reported for this movie anywhere, unless I'm missing something obvious. -- DreamsReign 01:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)Headlines. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 00:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/articles/2493.asp
There are no sources for genre, I had them removed. I don't think they should be applied for films that haven't been released yet. I don't necessarily disagree with them, but I do think they need to be cited before the film comes out, or at least kept simple and minimal. Currently there a descriptor of three genres in the lead, which needs to be simplified. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 10:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Possibly being retitled to "Sin City: A Dame to Die For"
Sources: http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a529392/sin-city-sequel-retitled-a-dame-to-die-for.html http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3263474/afm-13-market-artwork-for-sin-city-a-dame-to-kill-for/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.17.75 ( talk) 00:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The title was changed to 'Frank Miller's Sin City: A Dame to Kill for" - request to change the wiki article title? Source: http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/02/25/sin-city-sequel-is-now-officially-frank-millers-sin-city-a-dame-to-kill-for Morganglick ( talk) 20:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Is there a reason why her name should not be listed in these places? She is the title character of the film, after all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:81A1:EB00:1452:5195:6875:6CD5 ( talk) 15:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
the original title of this movie is "Frank Miller's Sin City: A Dame to Kill for"
Djwarid (
talk)
19:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As this film contains multiple narratives (like the previous film), this should be described as an anthology film in the opening paragraph. PatTheMoron ( talk) 09:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
The lead section states "The film opened to mixed critical reviews and debuted at #8 at the box office, making it a bomb". Does this make it a bomb? I see it hasn't performed well in the States and has just opened in the UK (I saw it last night - can I get my money back...). As it's only been out a short time, is it too soon to call it a bomb? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I've seen a bit of debate over this in the article history, so this seems like a good place to start a discussion. I think the term "sequel" to describe this film is entirely inaccurate, as it takes place before, during, and after. I would suggest that we echo the wording found at
300: Rise of an Empire and just refer to the film as a "follow-up" to Sin City. Thoughts?
Sock
(tock talk)
16:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Anyone have an idea on how to deal with this IP that is trying to add a review to promote his website? Koala15 ( talk) 00:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
"The movie received mixed reviews, with critics praising the acting, visuals and writing, but it lacks of updates and was a box office flop..."
"Lacks of updates"? I'd fix that if I knew what it meant. –
AndyFielding (
talk)
06:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)