![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
...in America, the definition of "short subject" was almost the same as the American definition of " featurette"? What was the point of having the word "featurette", then? And what exactly did they call films shorter than 20 minutes? Esn 11:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
...Hello, Our company have developed a website purely for filmmakers to upload their Short Films for free. Please visit
Shouldn't the redirect be the other way around? -- 72.138.186.64 10:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Hrish Thota from FilmCamp.TV. Our site is a collection of what we call "New Indian Cinema". It is a collection of short films from India just in the same way as BritFilms.TV is for Britian. Request you to please let add the following link to this article:
FilmCamp.TV - a collection of professionally made short films and movies from India.
can i change this article:??????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.94.141.5 ( talk) 21:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
www.filmcamp.tv
thankyou, hrish —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrish.thota ( talk • contribs) 14:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The image File:Joe McDoakes title card.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 11:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I never even heard of the industry term "short subject" before I tried to link to short film. The lead appears to be written from the perspective of film buffs rather than the average reader. Please fix this as soon as possible.
Peter Isotalo 18:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
It says in the header: The description is now used almost interchangeably with short film'. Like all the others that have commented above, I too have never heard of the term "short subject", so this statement is probably incorrect these days. hence the move request below. Jubilee♫ clipman 16:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Moved to Short film. While the discussion here was sparse, there were no objections and the category is Category:Short films. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Short subject → Short Film — "Short Film" is the usual term these days, if "Short" is excluded because of its ambiguous meaning. -- Jubilee♫ clipman 15:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Please add this site to your links. This site features news, reviews and views about short films.
www.shortfilmtalks.tk —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadoRed ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I'm working with OCLC, and we are algorithmically generating data about different Genres, like notable Authors, Book, Movies, Subjects, Characters and Places. We have determined that this Wikipedia page has a close affintity to our detected Genere of short-films. It might be useful to look at [1] for more information. Thanks. Maximilianklein ( talk) 23:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)