This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
A fact from Shin-chan: Me and the Professor on Summer Vacation appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 September 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Sacco Saito, who arranged and performed the theme song for Shin-chan: Me and the Professor on Summer Vacation, was not told the content of the game until after the song had been recorded?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT2: ... that Sacco Saito, who performed and arranged the theme song for Shin-chan: Me and the Professor on Summer Vacation, was not told the content of the game until after the song had been recorded? Source: Memories Record Book: This is the Memory of the Creators
Article nominated within several days of creation. Article has over 1,500 characters in prose and is neutral. QPQ has been done. Earwig picked up a 50% violation but it's an error as most of the "copyright violations" is from the long title of the article. ALT2 is the most interesting in my opinion. Image used is free and in article. Plot section is entirely unsourced; Travel "Material's" Book -MEMORIES- needs to follow
MOS:JAPAN#Titles of media. Once those can be fixed I think the article is good to go.
lullabying (
talk)
00:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I'll call dibs on this one as it looks interesting. Not a game I'm familiar with personally, but it looks like a neat one. The article looks really good on a cursory review, but I'll have some specific feedback for you shortly.
Red Phoenixtalk00:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
So, this looks really good. Nice work. I don't usually use templates for these, but I want to demonstrate that I've reviewed for all of the criteria:
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
As a subject matter expert when it comes to
WP:VG/RS, these are reliable sources, including the Japanese ones. A pass through the copyvio detector showed no real issues; those that did flag are simply because of the game's long title. No signs of OR.
Images have appropriate rationales (I even marked them as reviewed for possessing rationales), and even have alt text. That is fantastic!
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Let's discuss the sectioning, but I think we'll be passing this very shortly.
A couple of points of feedback:
Only sourcing question I had was with the Japanese reviews. I'm presuming you have already, but did you check to see if the reviewers have names? I don't read Japanese so I can't determine, but I just wanted to be sure we're covering all the bases.
I've double checked and the 4Gamer and Famitsu writers are respectively credited mononymously as "Tamako" and "Nishikawa", which is not an uncommon practice in the Japanese enthusiast press, but I think it would just create confusion in the article if it stated "Tamako of 4Gamer..." or what have you.
Morgan695 (
talk)
01:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Okay, so let's talk sectioning. The one issue I have is with how much things are broken up into sections and paragraphs. While I understand the principles of doing small sections in order to divide up every concept, articles read with better fluency if we consolidate smartly. Namely, here are the changes I would suggest:
Remove the subsections from Reception, and take the sales statement and make it the first sentence of the first paragraph. It still fits the reception mold: how a product sold is the ultimate measure of how it was received by the public, and it can still be followed by the Metacritic sentence as that is a measure of how it was received by the press. The opening paragraph then fits as an introduction to the section.
Condense the last paragraph of Release into the paragraph above. We talk about all the languages the worldwide release was in in that paragraph, then do a separate paragraph for its release date. That just seems excessive and segmented.
Consider combining the Planning and Production subheaders of development, and combining the two Production paragraphs together. They would possess better flow and still read sensibly in such a manner.
Overall looks really good. Let me know when you have looked into my feedback points, and I'm fully anticipating I'll be passing this article in a very short amount of time. Nicely done.
Red Phoenixtalk01:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply