This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with
Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose merging
Shambhala Buddhism into
Shambhala Training. By everything I can find, not even Shambhala International seems to actively use the phrase “Shambhala Buddhism”, instead preferring to use terms like “Shambhala Training”, “Shambhala Path”, “Shambhala Vision”, etc. Even Googling “Shambhala Buddhism”, you see not too many outside references mention a “Shambhala Buddhism” specifically. So being that the latter article seems to be under the preferred terminology, I believe it would be better for the articles to be merged.
2600:1702:35F0:A1D0:0:0:0:663 (
talk)
16:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge direction is wrong. If there is a merge, which I am not sure I agree with, the
Shambhala Training should be merge into
Shambhala Buddhism, not the other way around; the Training is obviously subsidiary and only part of the broader tradition, the tradition was not formed from the training. Shambhala Buddhism also teaches the traditional approach - the training program is something optional and was clearly stated by Trungpa to be different and separate from the received traditions of the lineage, which were not themselves eliminated.
Skyerise (
talk)
16:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.