This article was nominated for deletion on 24 February 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rocketry This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Middle East This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Middle Eastern military history task force

According to some sources Project Koussar is another name for the Shahab-6. However, according to Jane's, Project Koussar is independent of the current Shahab line of missiles. Does anyone have more info? Offliner ( talk) 08:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The information in these articles is based on Israeli allegation from the mid 1990's. I think it is safe to say that these articles are all politically motivated Science Fiction with no basis, and full denial from the Iranian government throughout this time. Zenbb ( talk) 08:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply

All I read here are illusions and fantasies'! So I ask myself "Can illusions be put in the encyclopedia? Do not these illusions undermine the credibility of the encyclopedia?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.131.125.17 ( talk) 18:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply