This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shah Mir dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Shah Mir dynasty. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Shah Mir dynasty at the Reference desk. |
Article merged: See old talk-page here
It appears that the articles Sayyid Dynasty and Shah Miri dynasty refer to the same dynasty. Both articles refer to a dynasty which ruled Kashmir from 1339 to 1561 and was founded by Shah Mir.
"Sayyid Dynasty" seems to be the most commonly used name. There is an Encyclopedia Britannica article under the name Sayyid dynasty. The existing Shah Miri dynasty article has about 10 links to it and the Sayyid Dynasty article has about 74 links. Google searches for "Shah Miri dynasty" -wikipedia amd "Sayyid Dynasty" -wikipedia are roughly equal. Google Scholar, gives a slight advantage to "Sayyid Dynasty". Google Books gives a solid advantage to "Sayyid Dynasty".
I propose that Shah Miri dynasty be merged into Sayyid Dynasty, and that Shah Miri dynasty be changed to a redirect to Sayyid Dynasty.
I will place notices on the talk pages of the main recent contributors to both articles. After a week or so, I would be happy to complete the merge if that is what the consensus decides. Thank you. SchreiberBike ( talk) 05:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shah Mir dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Saqib Sarwar mir ,he is from a village in district Kupwara (Darpora lolab). He is pursuing a BA from GDC Sogam. He once told that "Alhumdullilah , I'm muslim and this is the biggest gift Allah has given me i.e Emaan .He wants to become a full time preacher of Islam and also a Philanthropist .He is from Science background ,the reason to shift to humanities was one & only to crack civil service examination (UPSC) . He is bright , Genius and remains topper also .He wants to be a Religious scholar and is influenced by some famous personalities like Abu ala mohdudi rh, Dr Israr , Dr Zakir Naik. Huge love and respect for this Human being ❣️ 117.98.100.51 ( talk) 14:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Someguywhosbored No, wink mentions that he was "probably" an Afghan or Qaruna Turk from Swat, not just "Afghan". Then he states that he may have been even a Tibetan, another completely different origin. Perhaps your concern is about Afghan mention, then you should find a better source. Sutyarashi ( talk) 06:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
The current edition cited in the article is EJ Brill's first Encyclopedia of Islam (1913 – 1936), and is a mere reprint of it in 1970. Thus, it clearly falls under WP:RAJ. I have added reference to second edition, but in my opinion the previous one should be removed as it is now outdated. Sutyarashi ( talk) 08:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)