This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Gcoconnell19 (
article contribs).
Added the Definition of Qualified Individual according to the USA Department of Labor Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the
help page).
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Hi friends, This article is very long and encompasses many topics. They do all relate to 504, but I think some of them deserve their own space. I'm talking particularly about the protests and other activism as that does not specifically, culturally and historically speaking, impact only Section 504. Thoughts?
Jackiekoerner (
talk)
04:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Dodger67: and @
Pommette1789: what are your thoughts about separating out the activism onto another page and keeping the information about the legislation here? I'd love to hear other thoughts as well before I get started separating the article into two parts. Thanks!
Jackiekoerner (
talk)
22:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Hi! I haven't worked on this article yet, but I've been watching it since I'm interested in the history of
Federal Office Building (San Francisco, California). Currently the article is not yet at the 50k guideline for when articles may need to be divided based on size -
Wikipedia:Article size#Size guideline. I'd especially hesitate on moving the 504 occupation material out of this article, since it's such an important part of the story of Section 504. I'd suggest looking for bits that can be removed from the current article without losing encyclopedic information - some of the current language veers slightly from
WP:NPOV, and it could help to tighten those sentences and fit them closely to references.
Dreamyshade (
talk)
05:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I tried pruning some sentences and rearranging a few paragraphs, to give the article more room to grow; it could use more of that kind of work. I also added a few "citation needed" tags to some sentences that made larger claims without references. Thanks for working on this article!
Dreamyshade (
talk)
06:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply