This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Top importance?
I think this article should become high importance. While the Second Aliyah practically built the Yishuv, it's still not a core topic of Israel. --
Ynhockey(
Talk)17:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Role of Zionism
I don't understand the logic behind this sentence:
"The Zionist ideology played a minor factor for Jewish emigration to Palestine as indicate by the proportionally small number of immigrants compared to those who went to the US."
The only way this makes sense is if we assume all Jews to have been Zionists. Then we could rightly say that although there were (e.g.) 2 million Zionists who emigrated, only 50,000 came to Palestine, ergo Zionism played only a small role in the Second Aliya. But there is no way to know how many subscribed to Zionist ideology and of those, what percentage went to Palestine. Also, even if only 2.5% of Zionists went to Palestine, that doesn't mean that the ones who did go were NOT motived to a large extent by Zionism.
I don't think any of this is more than speculation and move for the section to be removed unless a valid source can be cited to back it up.
MosheEmes (
talk)
01:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I second
MosheEmes's criticism (although I don't agree with his argument either, but that's moot). The argument in this section of the article appears illogical and is not attributed to any source. The question addressed in this section is:
Did Zionism play a major role in the Second Aliyah? I.e. was Zionism a major motivation for those immigrants from Eastern Europe who chose to go to Palestine?
The evidence in the article addresses the question:
Did Zionism play a major role in the mass exodus of Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe in the early 20th century?
The evidence in the article - that most of these immigrants chose the USA or other countries offering greater economic opportunity and less discrimination - suggests that Zionism played a small role in this exodus over all. But it doesn't answer what role it played for that small subset of immigrants who, against their economic best interests, chose to go to Palestine? There are other possible explanations for this decision (immigrants leaving Russia were misinformed about conditions in Palestine, the journey was easier, etc), but the article supports none of these.
123forman (
talk) 17:07, 4 July 2014 (GMT)
I'm glad others noticed the inconsistency of this paragraph. Indeed, if anything the evidence provided in this section supports the idea that Zionism did play a role, since it points out that escape from poverty or persecution would not have been achieved by immigration to Palestine. I propose deleting the section and moving the background information provided there and in the introduction into a "Background" section.
Hydroargenium (
talk)
16:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)reply
This section is illogical, contains grammatical errors and appears to be an example of someone trying to push a personal view. The article would be best served if the sections was deleted entirely.
Alan3278 (
talk)
11:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
What you removed, apart from the short final paragraph, is supported by three academic sources written by respected experts. If it isn't a good reflection of the sources or is not written well, you should study the sources and improve the text according to what they say. It doesn't matter in the least whether you agree with it or consider it illogical. The role of Zionism in the second aliyah is now not mentioned at all, despite this obviously being a very important question.
Zerotalk03:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)reply
I do not have access to the sources you quote but I have seen articles by one of the experts, Gur Alroey, and what he writes is much more nuanced than the view expressed in this section. The assertion that 'the role of Zionism in the second Aliyah is now not mentioned at all' is simply untrue.
86.26.64.65 (
talk)
12:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)reply
You shouldn't edit on the basis of recollections. Also, in your version Zionism is not mentioned at all in the body of the article.
Zerotalk12:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)reply
New Zionism section
A new section on Zionism was added, sourced to a paper which I'd like to get my hands on. Is this available anywhere online somewhere?
Currently the section repeats the same idea a few times, so it can be trimmed significantly, but I don't have access to the source. It also contradicts itself: it says that Zionism was not a major factor in the immigration to the Land of Israel, but at the same time people who did immigrate suffered economic hardships and persecution in Israel as well. It should probably read that Zionism was not a major factor in emigration from Eastern Europe, but the people who did choose to emigrate to Israel were Zionists—but again, I don't have access to the source and don't know exactly what it says on the subject.