![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think copywright laws apply to a government webpage but maybe i am wrong
Regarding this article and copyright issues: Please see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 3#Template:PD-MNGov and the related commons discussions for some reasons why we no longer presume that MN state works are free for use without an explicit release. VernoWhitney ( talk) 18:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Here is a great article that talks about the history of the seal incase someone is looking to update this page: http://www.leg.state.mn.us/webcontent/leg/symbols/sealarticle.pdf -- Svgalbertian ( talk) 15:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Seal of Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This section lacks balance and neutral POV. Very cleary has a bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcb133aco ( talk • contribs)
Added links to redesign commission authorization. Note: this does not mean the seal has or will be redesigned, the commission's proposal must be approved by the legislature. Mrfeek ( talk) 14:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The redesign section says there are 19 stars to represent MN being the 19th state (as the old seal had), but in the new redesign image, I don't see 19 stars. Was that changed? Or does our image need updating? (Or are my old eyes just not seeing them?) Dcs002 ( talk) 01:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey all,
I think one of the this article's difficulties is the fact that the criticism of the previous seal(s) is not unique to any one individual seal, but to the entire motif and series of historic seals. So the problem arises, where to put the section on criticism. After the most previous seal? In its own section under history? I don't know the right answer here. I think a potential rewrite could be History section, subheadings for each of the various iterations, followed by one criticism subheading for the historic seal. Calling it the 1858 seal in the context of criticism is confusing since the critique is for multiple versions, not just that one.
Sorry for rambling, I'm just trying to make my thoughts coherent about this. The Savage Norwegian 16:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)