This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Saurolophus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Saurolophus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 25, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that though many specimens of
Saurolophus angustirostris have been found, it was not clearly differentiated as a separate species from
Saurolophus osborni until 2011? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article is well written, appropriately referenced, reasonably broad but not trivial, NPOV, stable, and uses images correctly. That covers every one of the good article criteria. Since I can see no obvious differences with the criteria, I am going to add this article to the GA list. Good job!-- Jayron32| talk| contribs 18:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It may be beneficial to look for any updates, or see if there were any more recent stories in the news. I would also recommend updating the access dates of the sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 07:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I was about to add it here, but is it just me or are the crest shapes wrong? http://www.plosone.org/article/slideshow.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031295&imageURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031295.g013 FunkMonk ( talk) 13:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I guess mine is no longer worth including? de Bivort 00:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)