This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
The team name is no longer Saunier DuvalâScott, but Team Scott certainly hasn't become "the most commonly recognised name", and it is hoped that Scott will not be the only/main name sponsors for long. So should it be moved?
Kevin McE (
talk)
21:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)reply
According to the article, Saunier Duval is a brand: the company making/marketing that brand are redlinked. Until they have taken part in several high profile races, the Scott-American Beef team name will not be well known. Many riders and races have links to the Saunier Duval page, and will not expect to see information about water heaters. So no, I don't think that that would be useful.
Kevin McE (
talk)
21:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Possibly a disambiguation page? - historically people may want to see cycling stuff for years to come - but once things have truly settled down, it won't make much sense for Saunier Duval to be primarily cycling. A disambiguation could happen now - and be updated once team name has been conirmed
86.16.168.115 (
talk)
11:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Did this team
ever actually race as "Scott-American Beef?" I can't ever recall seeing that in results, and the time between Saunier Duval dropping sponsorship and Scott also dropping sponsorship was only a few months. And what of "American Beef" as a sponsor, for that matter?
Nosleepbreak my slumber06:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)reply
the wikipedia page states that they won 3 stages last year in the tour de france. this is a lie, in my opinion. the riders tested positive after the stage wins so maybe they should be deleted? thoughts? i have put in a note thing to states that they are both cheats but should it go further and just got rid of the wins from the system. I apologise if i sound strong about it
Phil_NolteTC20:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)reply
As far as I can tell, the wins still have not been officially revoked (see
2008 Tour de France). Therefore, I think your note addition is valid, but they should not be deleted yet. These things tend to take an incredible amount of time to be finalized.
Malo0178 (
talk)
20:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)reply
so the uci has released new sanctions so i think he needs some strikethroughs on some results
"The UCI has announced that the former Movistar rider was found guilty of doping from 2009 and 2011, based on abnormalities in his biological passport."[1]Troyeseffigy (
talk)
22:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)reply