![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Having been in the 1994 strike, it would be nice to expand upon that, versus the brief mention. GXIndiana ( talk) 22:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
NPOV means we include any published criticism, much like we have for other media outlets. We just don't judge whether the criticism is accurate or not. The Bay Guardian criticism is in a legitimate, published, verifiable source, and as such is readded. Calwatch 20:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Including pride of place for one AND ONLY ONE piece of criticism/viewpoint and pretending you're following NPOV isn't the least bit intellectually honest. Try again, and at least PRETEND you understand NPOV. -- Calton | Talk 00:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Could someone create an article for the famous author for the Chronicle named Joan Ryan? Thanks! Jccort ( talk) 18:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
The main article says: "today only the Los Angeles Times exceeds the Chronicle's circulation on the West Coast, while the paper is ranked 12th by circulation nationally." But a quick look at "The Oregonian" newspaper in Portland (on Wikipedia) shows a circulation that is greater than the Chronicle. This needs to be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattquist ( talk • contribs) 06:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Mattquist ( talk) 06:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Does the paper have an actual or apparent policy on outing? The title of the piece that outed Judge Vaughn R. Walker was "Judge being gay a nonissue during Prop. 8 trial". Of course if the San Francisco Chronicle staff really thought it was a 'nonissue', it wouldn't have been thusly titled, and wouldn't have been published. This was the height of disingenuity by the Chron itself, which decided to run it after "great debate" involving Matier and Ross and "the paper's editor and publisher". --98.248.113.11 (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.113.11 ( talk)
A fairly large paragraph has been recently written because the Chron is changing out it's weekly TV section. In my opinion this change in their TV guide is has no merit whatsoever for inclusion in this article, and if we need it the info could be done in a sentence. But considering the long storied history of the Chron, with all of the changes made to its content and format over the years, this long paragraph about such a trivial change is pointless. -- Fizbin ( talk) 22:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I am dissatisfied with how "Fizbin" has handled the "TV Guide" matter. The switch of the TV Guide from a free supplement to a paid one is a significant change. I see your point about it being too long in comparison with the rest of the article, but the complete deletion is unacceptable. I suggest that you add a sentence that summarizes the key point(s), as you've suggested, instead of deleting it all. Otherwise people like me will stop contributing to Wikipedia. [I also suggest that you brush up on your grammar ("it's/its") before taking a meat cleaver to others' work.] Jab73 ( talk) 08:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The SFgate.com page currently redirects to this page, but as of 2019, SFGATE and the Chronicle are two separate entities with separate newsrooms.
Would some editors be willing to create a separate page for SFGATE for clarity?
Here are some sources: https://www.kqed.org/news/92381/san-francisco-chronicle-launches-pay-wall-reporters-launch-twitter-strike
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125914124
Because of COI, WP:SCOIC I cannot do this. Snailtortoisechicken ( talk) 20:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Toll Booth Willie: @ Toll Booth Willie: Hi there! Thank you so much for taking the time to help us out. Here are some answers to the questions you listed!
- Are they still owned by the same company? If so, is it the immediate operating company of the Chronicle, or a corporate/holding company that’s a step or two above the Chronicle’s publisher?
Yes, both the Chronicle and SFGATE are both owned by Hearst, along with many other print and digital publications.
- Despite having separate newsgathering staffs, is there still any sharing of content between them? That is, might a story written by an SFgate reporter end up published on the Chronicle website or print edition? Might a photograph taken by a Chronicle photog end up on SFgate, in addition to being on the Chronicle-named properties? Does this sharing always happen, or frequently, or rarely?
No, there’s no longer any sharing of content between SFGATE or the Chronicle. The two operations now operate in silos, without any sharing of photos or content published since the middle of 2019.
- Are their business offices integrated? That includes ad sales staff but might also include the HR department, accounting, IT department, etc.
We share Hearst resources: for instance we use the same accounts payable team as the San Antonio News-Express, SeattlePI.com and the Chronicle. Our ad sales team includes a local ad sales group in SF that sells for both the Chronicle and SFGATE, as well as national programmatic ad sales that are used across the Hearst network for every newspaper/digital operation, etc.
- Does SFgate.com publish opinion pieces, and if so, does it have different writers or even a different editorial voice than the online or print Chronicle?
Yes, and yes, and yes. We have two opinion columnists at SFGATE: Drew Magary ( /info/en/?search=Drew_Magary) and Rod Benson ( /info/en/?search=Rod_Benson). You can find their bios here ( https://www.sfgate.com/author/drew-magary/) and here ( https://www.sfgate.com/author/rod-benson/). They only write for SFGATE, not the Chronicle because, again, our editorial departments operate in silos. Unlike the Chronicle, SFGATE doesn’t have an editorial board that makes election recommendations, etc.
- Does SFgate cover a different territory than the Chronicle? That is, is one of them more focused on one or a few cities on the Bay, while the other is more regional/statewide in focus?
We cover the San Francisco Bay Area, just as the Chronicle does, but we’ve also expanded in various parts of California (and beyond) where the Chronicle has not: in September of 2020 SFGATE hired a contributing editor (who lives in the Reno-Tahoe area) who exclusively covers Lake Tahoe ( https://www.sfgate.com/renotahoe/) for SFGATE, a contributing editor who exclusively covers California Parks ( https://www.sfgate.com/california-parks/) (with a particular emphasis on Yosemite), and a contributing editor in Southern California who exclusively covers Disneyland ( https://www.sfgate.com/disneyland/). We also regularly cover Hawaii ( https://www.sfgate.com/hawaii/). It’s part of a broader affinity expansion to cover things we know our readers care about in California and just beyond, plus in most cases we’re providing in-depth journalism in areas that have become relative media deserts.
Also one other point of differentiation from the Chronicle: The SFGATE Sports department strives to not be beholden to access — with rare exceptions, staffers don’t attend team media availabilities, practices, or games. Anything that teams control, we’ve opted out of in order to maintain a balanced, critical eye of pro and collegiate organizations and institutions.
Again, thanks so much for your help!
Snailtortoisechicken ( talk) 00:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I see mention that the online archives on their main website only go back as far as 1995. And then the "San Francisco Chronicle Historical" on the San Francisco Public Library website covers from 1865 to 1922. How does one find the newspaper archives from 1923 to 1994? PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 06:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)