This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I love what you have written, thank you! Sorry for the late peer review, but I will paste it below:
This is a wonderful article you are creating, thank you.
Under the History heading, the 's does not need to go after Arikara (two instances). The "in defense" and "in assistance" sentences are a bit unclear to read at first. Under the Mission heading, "The Sahnish Scouts belief" should be "Scout's belief" and the end of the sentence feels out of order in some way... maybe flip represented and looked for around, or find better wording for "looked for." Under the Notable Cases heading, toward the end, there should be a space so it reads 1 pm, and the dates need commas. The inclusion of a background for why the scouts exist is great! The created article does a great job of including brief info on everything the reader should be aware of while learning about the topic.
The main thing I noticed is that you might need a lead to briefly summarize everything brought up. The image included is very useful, but the state and country maybe should be included, and the description maybe a bit more detailed. The tone feels appropriate and neutral, excluding a few instances of wordiness. The article is very well-organized. Great job with links. Your sources seem exhaustive enough, varied, very current, appropriate (aside from the Facebook page since it is a primary source, which Wikipedia for some reason does not like).
JHolman43 (
talk)
20:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)reply