The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the SS Suevic of the
White Star Line ran into rocks off the coast of
England while steaming at full speed in dense fog at night in 1907 but everyone on board survived?
Current status: Good article
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of
Belfast,
Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.BelfastWikipedia:WikiProject BelfastTemplate:WikiProject BelfastBelfast-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of
Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about
Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline
How to write about settlements.
At
WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the
policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly
civility and
consensus building. We are aware that the wording on
Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see
WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as
Constitutional status of Cornwall,
Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
The line "The RNLI continue to perpetuate a myth that there was dense fog AND a strong gale simultaneously. This, of course, is impossible." seems both partial and unverified, representing an opinion as well as accusing the RNLI of deliberate falsehood. Surely this should be amended or removed to maintain the article's status as a Good Article? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A00:23C4:B639:8D01:E002:7E80:2535:D71B (
talk)
02:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Citations should be placed in accordance with
WP:CITE.
Done!
"...most remarkable..." - this is a bit POV - can you find a citation which quotes this?
I see your point, I've pulled the term. Several of the refs describe the rescue in similar terms, but not this exact one.
"Because these ships were launched in the last year of the 19th century, they were referred to as the "Jubilee Class"." - can you explain the connection?
The dawning of the 20th century was generally heralded in the popular press at the time as something remarkable (they obviously didn't have the doomsday worries of Y2K!). I've added the clarifying phrase, "reflecting the popular mood regarding the coming of the new century" to the article. Hope that helps.
"...the danger..." - can you clarify the what the danger was?
Section re-written/expanded to clarify the dangers, with surrounding sentences modified for flow. Please let me know if this works for you.
"...a quarter mile..." - British English ought to apply here so let's use "a quarter of a mile".
Done!
Reduce the number of sub-sections in the Shipwreck section.
Down to 3 now.
Merge "The damaged bow was left to break up on the rocks.[7]" into previous para.
Done!
British English once more so let's use First World War and Second World War instead of the WWI and it's sequel, and instead of "Her crew was taken as prisoners of war.[2] " Brits would say "Her crew were taken as prisoners of war.[2]", despite the grammatical debate this usually conjures up!
Done!
External links go last, and See also comes first - References in between them, per
WP:HEAD.
Done, and thanks for the nudge on this. I spend most of my time over at
WP:AIR, and that project has a variant set of guidelines where SAs come after ELs...sometimes I forget that the rest of Wikipedia is the other way around!
It's a really good article and very close indeed to GA so I'll put the review on hold - please tidy up the above and I'll gladly pass the article.
The Rambling Man16:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Ok, there you have it. Hope I've met your concerns, but if there are others, I'd be happy to work up changes for them as well. Cheers, and many thanks for the review! AKRadeckiSpeaketh01:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a
Good article. I had to consider this for a while, as many of the sources in this article are not from sources that necessarily qualify under
WP:RS. In the end however I have decided to pass it. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,
Jackyd101 (
talk)
10:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Sweden's biggest environmental hazard
Skytteren, som ligger på botten
utanför Lysekil, är Sveriges miljö-
farligaste vrak.
Det kommer en riskanalys från Chalmers
som presenteras på torsdag att visa,
skriver Bohusläningen.
När fartyget sjönk 1942 fanns 500
kubikmeter olja ombord, och den läcker
fortfarande ut. Hur mycket som finns
kvar i dag vet man inte.
I have just modified 2 external links on
SS Suevic. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.