![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please do not place any further Thomas the Tank engine information on this article, as there is already enough information on that page, which one can reach via the link in this article. Please keep Wikipedia tidy! Cheers. -- Bulleid Pacific 17:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks to user:Prellbock18's addition of the stock list to this article. Its removal, with the given reason that there are two stock lists, is unfortunate. It doesn't reflect reality - there is only one stock list in the article, not two. Tony May ( talk) 05:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|}
marker to terminate the table.hey any thomas and friends references given about the SR usa class tanks replacing LBSCR E2's at SouthHampton docks is actually accurate do to the E2 class were having steaming and other mechanical faults this what's known in railway circles as a major failure and that's why the USA class were brought in it wasn't to replace the LSWR B4 tanks as they had already been replaced by the LBSCR E2 tanks 155.94.102.106 ( talk) 09:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
lbscr e2's had been working at Southampton docks for somewhere in the range of 10 to 20 years and yes Southampton was still using some lswr b4 tanks do to the e2 tank's mechanical issues 155.94.102.106 ( talk) 09:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Merger proposal with USATC S100 Class
I see nothing in particular about the history of the locomotive that requires it to have a separate Wikipedia article detailing its history on the Southern Railway. It is the same locomotive regardless, and the main S100 article seems like a better place to host information on the engine. Xboxtravis7992 ( talk) 02:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)