This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about
electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the
project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the 1944 SCR-720radar was used only briefly by the
USAAF, but was a primary
RAF system into the late 1950s? Source: different sources for RAF and Navy, but the aircraft in question all left front-line service between 1959 and 1961.
First two paragraphs of "in service" section do not appear to be cited. I have to AGF on many references since I do not have access to the books, but the citation from the second paragraph is cited to a PDF which does not relate and the first paragraph is not cited.
Bruxton (
talk)
18:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Maury Markowitz: Sorry I am so late getting back here! Interesting article, and hook. The image is free and also interesting to me. I love those old WWII era aircraft. I do not see any obvious copyright violations, but I cannot access some references. You have completed a QPQ, and the article is new enough and at 25,537 characters, it is long enough. Note: I think we need to pout some projects on the talk page.
Bruxton (
talk)
03:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)reply