Rugoconites is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on
marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Would it be okay if I would have the permission to include the following line?
...But, since a synonym of this genus is "Lorenzinities" , there might be three species because there exists a species called
Lorenzinites rarus ,
which is though to actually be a cnidarian , or either a misshapen fossil specimen of a rugoconites"
I am including this line because I want to also say that Lorenzinities is a synonym for the genus , and that the species L. rarus is part of the Lorenzinities group , but , doesn't share any similarities with both R. enigmaticus or R. tenuirugosus. And that it might actually be a
CnidarianRugoconites Tenuirugosus (
talk)
09:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosusreply
This sounds like
WP:OR, which is not unacceptable here. Please cite a reliable source on this page first and quote the text upon which you might base any such edit upon. I no longer have much confidence in your abilities to understand and differentiate published expert opinion by scientists from your own amateur sleuthing and guesswork.
Nick Moyes (
talk)
01:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply