This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ru ware article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Ru ware appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | A fact from Ru ware appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 September 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ru ware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
"Famous" removed from lede per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. There's no need to use the word in any Wikipedia article. If it is truly famous, then the writing should reflect the fact as the essay says. - Bri.public ( talk) 22:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
famous — if not most famous — as [one of] “the three greatest beauties of all time.”without clarifying that this is only the case in Japan. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
The page had a spike in readership yesterday of 5,334 views. This was due to its appearance again in DYK in the lead hook:
Note that this article got the best result of the four blue links, even beating the nominal subject, which only got 4,983. See views. I suppose it's because the phrase looks odd initially and so people click through to find out what it means. Andrew D. ( talk) 11:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)