This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Royal Golden Eagle article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I have done a bunch of work on this article over the past 24 hours. In particular to recover some criticism that had been lost in the recent edits, toned down what felt like advertising and separated the bare facts about the operations from the community and environmental claims made about these operations.
PeterEastern (
talk)
09:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Royal Golden Eagle. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
Corrected formatting/usage for //http:/www.rgmi.com/index.php/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,/task,doc_download/gid,8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Sateri is the world's largest viscose staple fiber producers, with an annual production capacity of 1.1 million metric tonnes of viscose staple fiber. It has operations in China, comprising a viscose staple fiber production facility in Putian, Fujian, and mills in Jiangxi and Jiangsu.[1][2]
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a
conflict of interest has been implemented.
Information to be edited: First paragraph, as follows -
Royal Golden Eagle (RGE, also known as Raja Garuda Emas, previously Raja Garuda Mas) is an integrated resource-based industrial group headquartered in Singapore. It manages a global group of companies in the pulp and paper, viscose, palm oil and clean energy industries. Owned by
Indonesian businessman
Sukanto Tanoto, the group employs 60,000 people worldwide with assets exceeding
US$20 billion.[1]
Explanation of issue: More accurate description that is aligned with references. RGE is headquartered in Singapore.
Hi
HawkEggz. Trying to separate out requests and claims here:
Singapore as headquarters in the lede. It's already in the infobox, and looking at other Asian Pacific conglomerates, like
Bakrie Group,
Kompas Gramedia Group and
Sinar Mas Group, don't have headquarters in the lede. Can you find some examples of pages that do?
Is the distinction between "with businesses" and "manages." If so, how about just that one-word change?
That second source should work for Viscose
Do you have a source for clean energy? That's also new here
Unfortunately, I can't find examples of HQ location in the lede, but you're right about the info box. The companies in the RGE group of companies are independently managed, and RGE is a management services company. The existing lede says Asia Pacific, but RGE has operations in Brazil and Canada (references below). Perhaps may I please suggest the first sentence be replaced with:
Royal Golden Eagle (RGE, also known as Raja Garuda Emas, previously Raja Garuda Mas) is an integrated global resource-based industrial group with businesses in pulp and paper, viscose, palm oil and clean energy industries. Owned by
Indonesian businessman
Sukanto Tanoto, the group employs 60,000 people worldwide with assets exceeding
US$20 billion.
How about "Royal Golden Eagle (RGE, also known as Raja Garuda Emas, previously Raja Garuda Mas) is global integrated, resource-based industrial group, with businesses in paper, palm oil, viscose, construction and energy, property and asset management"? Viscose is already mentioned in the article. For clean energy, where in the body would we put that? --
FeldBum (
talk)
19:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi
FeldBum. May I please suggest "Royal Golden Eagle (RGE, also known as Raja Garuda Emas, previously Raja Garuda Mas) is a global integrated, resource-based industrial group, with businesses in pulp and paper, palm oil, viscose, construction and clean energy, property and asset management"? There is a missing "a" before "global" and "clean" is inserted before "energy" in this sentence. RGE's business group APRIL is a producer of pulp and paper, not just paper (source:
https://jakartaglobe.id/special-updates/april-group-honored-for-commitment-to-sustainability). There aren't any citations on property and asset management, hence their omission from my previous proposed lede. Clean energy is covered in the sub-section on Pacific Oil & Gas, which is outdated, but LNG is already covered there. Will provide new secondary sources in the future for the community's review.
Marking this edit request as partially done. I'm skeptical about labeling LNG energy projects as "clean energy" – natural gas is still a fossil fuel, and, while cleaner than coal or petroleum, still produces significant emissions. This article ought to avoid
greenwashing.
Altamel (
talk)
04:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
References
^"RGE". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2020-04-20.