This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Nepal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Tibet This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Where does the k in Rongbuk come from? It's not in the Tibetan name given in this article. And why is it not Rongpu with a p? — Babelfisch 12:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I don't know, I thought of that, too. Rongbuk does seem to be the more common English name. Perhaps it is some local dialect of Tibetan? Or perhaps it is influenced one of the numerous unrelated languages spoken in the Himalayas? In any event, Rongbuk appears to be the most common name in English.— Nat Krause^{( Talk!)} 14:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply

It is in the Tibetan name: "Rdza-rong-phu". -- Voidvector 05:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply

I don't see the k. — Babelfisch 07:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Nobody asked me, but this article is written poorly. This reads more like a narrative of a novel than an encyclopedia article. Phrases such as "It [has] the most dramatic views in the world" simply do not belong in this article. Riobranden 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC) reply

• I did what I could to fix it, but it has issues that only a complete rewrite could solve. ~ Eidako 23:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC) reply

• Thank you -- Riobranden 19:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Does this article still warrant being called a stub? What more can be added? Maybe a link to more detailed info/photos? -- JD79 20:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC) reply