This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Oh, qu'il est bien "propre" cet article. -- On c qui ( talk) 21:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

This article is completely apologetic. Ignore all the critics, for example, here. -- Anton Olivenbaum ( talk) 11:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Anton_Olivenbaum reply

A website describing its content as "Opinions, debates, controversies around current events" (Opinions, débats, controverses autour de l'actualité is unlikely to qualify as a reliable source for the biography of a living person. The same rules apply on the French Wikipedia (see fr:Wikipédia:Sources_fiables#Opinion,_tribune_et_essai and fr:Wikipédia:Biographie_de_personne_vivante#Sources_sûres). The Crab Who Played With The Sea ( talk) 16:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply