This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
sir, total kayo nman po ang bagong mayor jan pakiayos po ng mga pulis mo karamihan sa mga pulis jan mga gago sila, tarantado pamangkin ko si glen hilario pinagbintangan hold uper binogbog na kinuha pa ang kita nya sa pamasada hindi nman pala si glen ang nang hold up npagkamalan lang.di magawa ng pamangkin ko na si glen magsumbong baka pag initan ng mga pulis jan.
sir, 2lungan nyo po sya malaki din nman ang natulong ng mga asawa sa inyo nung butohan naghirap po sila para lang po kau manalo.
maraming salamat po sir sana po bigyan nyo ng aksyon agad bago mangyari sa iba ang nangyari sa pamangkin ko si glen hilario na taga san jose isa lang syang tricycle driver. wait ko po ang response nyo.godbless and congrats!mabuhay kayo!wag nyo pong ipagwalang bahala ito. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
115.147.237.196 (
talk)
13:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)reply
File:Ph seal rizal rodriguez.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,
File:Ph seal rizal rodriguez.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
The business listing is removed because WP is not a directory, see
WP:NOTDIRECTORY. It would be much better to add a section on the economy that include a description of livelihood and various business sectors. --
P 1 9 9 •
TALK15:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Requested move 24 July 2019
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Some news articles may solely use "Rodriguez" to refer to the town for the sake of being "official". But the source I mentioned gives multiple examples of common usage of "Montalban" over Rodriguez such as in maps, names of local organizations. Other examples include
GMA News,
Spin.ph,
Philippine Statistic Authority. It is argued that Montalban is often used alongside with Rodriguez to avoid confusion of people unaware of its lesser common official name.
Hariboneagle927 (
talk)
22:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Citing your reference from the Philippine Statistics Authority, Rodriguez is being used as the main identifier for the town with Montalban being the alternative given to avoid confusion of people unaware of its lesser common official name. With regards to the request for renaming the article, I think the redirection of Montalban, Rizal to Rodriguez, Rizal is already sufficient and renaming the article would be an option if it would interfere with the consistency of materials, say a bill to rename the town was passed.
Markoolio97 (
talk)
01:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment The family of
Eulogio Rodriguez for which the municipality was renamed after has got to be the most traditional of all Filipino politicians (read: TRAPO) and what would be referred to these days as EPAL politician, for taking the name of one of the more famous municipalities in the province with its equally famous Montalban gorge and replacing it with their family name. And it didn't end there. They also took at least two major roads in Manila and named it E. Rodriguez, the España Boulevard Extension in New Manila and the C-5 segment in Pasig. Im surprised they didnt name the municipality E. Rodriguez and settled with just Rodriguez. Having said that, there is already a bill (House Bill 337) passed in the House of Representatives by Rizal 2nd District Rep. Juan Fidel Felipe Nograles last July 22nd, 2019 to try to restore the old historic and famous name of the municipality of Montalban. I believe it would be best to just wait it out as our Article Titles for Philippine Local Government Units follow their official names here, if you havent noticed.--
RioHondo (
talk)
15:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Thans for the trivia about the official name. I reviewed
MOS:PHIL and nothing is said about automatic preference for the official name for municipalities. If there was a consensus elsewhere, I believe it should also be mentioned in MOS:PHIL.
Hariboneagle927 (
talk)
23:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Yes, those town names should comply with
WP:COMMONNAME, and
WP:CONCISE too, I believe these towns names should be moved too, though it would be easier to reason their move due to not being that different from the official name unlike Rodriguez's (Montalban). I'm implying why the region's names where not "Region I", "Region II" is also because of
WP:COMMONNAME and for convenience reasons.
Hariboneagle927 (
talk)
03:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I support your reasoning too. But as this proposition covers the entire project and affects the nomenclature of all Philippine LGUs, a consensus among the active contributors must be arrived at first, and/or these changes must be instituted at MOS:PHIL before we can mass nominate them to follow their common names and other general WP guidelines like Concise and Precise. The case of Montalban is actually similar to
Bailen, Cavite, whose old name is still more commonly used by the locals. We would still need everyone's inputs though before moving these articles en masse.--
RioHondo (
talk)
09:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.