This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
@
Fram I saw you redirected this page to
Rococo#Painting. I think this topic is important enough and the current article is long enough to deserve a separate entry, especially given that
Rococo#Painting is not very detailed. If you think a merge would be better, I think it would be better to discuss in the Talk page first (and in case we do proceed with a merge, I think a lot of content from this page can be transferred over).
Note that this is not a machine translation, even though Deepl was used for the initial draft -- it was manually human-reviewed, but may still contain mistakes as the translator is not a specialist in the field.
(note: I tried redirecting the pain to Rococo painting, without the capitalization, but unfortunately a redirect exists there already, so I am not sure which tools should be used to preserve history)
This article has the same issues as most of the efforts of this campaign, and reads like a poorly translated essay more than a neutral, factual encyclopedic article. This one at least isn't written from a Spanish or Portuguese viewpoint but a more general one, but even so it is better to lead our readers to the existing paragraph for now. An article on Rococo painting would be worthwhile, but this one isn't it.
Fram (
talk)
17:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)reply