This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rockstar Vancouver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Rockstar Vancouver" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Rockstar Vancouver has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 11, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Rockstar Vancouver appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 September 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:Rockstar Vancouver logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 22:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos ( talk · contribs) 05:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Dibs. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Reviewing prelude: I review like an FAC in which I go from top to bottom and make suggestions as I go. I tend to focus on prose clarity and conciseness. If you disagree with a comment, I'm happy to discuss - unless it would make the article fail the GACR, I don't usually die on hills for my suggested changes.
I really have minimal comments here. The prose is crisp and concise and just enough context is given to introduce things and people without overexplaining. Sources are reliable, no concerns about facts/paraphrase on a quick spot check of a random few. Earwig shows no hits. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
23:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by IceWelder ( talk). Self-nominated at 11:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC).