This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rock Street Journal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Rock Street Journal appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a page that cites sources, and at the risk of sounding pompous, pretty well-written!! That definitely needs reconsidering..
As for the accusation that the article was written by the website owner, that's absolutely false. The article was created by me, and you can look on my userpage to see more of my contributions. I have no connection with RSJ, although I don't know how it's possible to prove it, or disprove it for that matter. I agree that the DYK hook on the main page looks like a promotion for the website, but I voiced the concern while nominating the article for DYK.. [1] The admin(s) who put it on the main page didn't think that was too important.. And the reason may be that RSJ is genuinely involved in promoting rock music in India, and this database is a part of that initiative. Hope this justifies keeping the article on WP. -- Longhairandabeard 02:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
it's CLEARLY an advert and disgusting how Wikipedia is being used. there's millions of great articles and we need to focus on adverts for publications! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.151.143 ( talk • contribs) 03:38, 22 February 2007
42,000? that's just a claim. jo se ph 22:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)