Archives:1,
2,
3,
4,
5Auto-archiving period: 90 days
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Roblox. Any such comments
may be removed or
refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Roblox at the
Reference desk.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
Pokémon Brick Bronze was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 4 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Roblox. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
Material from
Roblox was split to
List of Roblox games on
2021-05-12 from
this version. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on
WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
As per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was
Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?] Thinking of Roblox Studio
This article may need to undergo
summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is
United States, then an appropriate subpage would be
History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
Try to make the article have a better flow. Some sentences are quite short and can easily be merged with other sentences.
Expand the infobox: There are many more parameters that can be filled there; there isn't even a link to the website!
External links should go above references (at least I believe)
In
§ Development, it seems to read as more a timeline than an actual paragraph
There are some sections that can easily be merged, for example
§ Players, is this really worth a whole section?
This is just my opinion, but the article seems to go into
a bit too much detail. All of the sets include a code that can be used to redeem virtual items.
User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail
WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though.
Devonian Wombat (
talk)
03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Devonian Wombat, sorry for replying so late! Apologies I was viewing on mobile and got confused by the references, you are correct on that front. The reason there shouldn't be citations in the lead is that the lead is meant to relay information already said in the article, but this is not a huge problem. Good job on massively improving this article (really comparing the current article from when you first edited it and now is astounding)! — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs09:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I suggest splitting the
Erik Cassel article from
ROBLOX; Why on earth is Erik Cassel not a separate article? Erik is a vital person to ROBLOX's history, and articles like
Alex Balfanz,
Uplift Games or
Adopt Me! have already been developed without any questioning from the community, so the Erik Cassel page should also be a separate one from ROBLOX. This does not deserve to be a redirect page. It's way more important than that. He also doesn't have a minor appearance like the developers mentioned in this, he literally was one of the creators of the game.
MatEditzWiki (
talk15:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets
WP:GNG must be provided. --
ferret (
talk)
15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Good source for Erik Cassel's huge involvement in Roblox - [1][2] I believe these two together at minimum are sufficient reliable secondary sources. Countless articles from large outlets mention and build upon this trove of information.
Shredux (
talk)
23:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 March 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add to the History section, 2018-present information:
In March 2024, Roblox introduced two tools to speed up 3D content creation: automatic avatar customisation and a texture generator. Avatar customisation automatically converts 3D body meshes into live animated avatars. Texture generator allows you to create the appearance of objects using text descriptions.[1][2]Buuzbashi (
talk)
04:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Roblox has added dynamic pricing onto the platform on the price floor (the lowest amount of robux you can purchase something) and it has met controversy since some items can get expensive up to 100 Robux for the cheapest items on the Catalog.
It's probably worth mentioning but there is very little sources except one GameRant article and Roblox slighty mentioning on their Developer Wiki.