This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a draft talk page for the proposed page about Robert Ehrlich (physicist). Thank you for taking a look. 24.210.152.37 ( talk) 13:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC) I'm adding a little more, just to see what happens. 24.210.152.37 ( talk) 13:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
I have found several categories, in Ehrlich's co-author Maria Dworzecka's page /info/en/?search=Maria_Dworzecka which appear to be applicable to him. Here they are - without the formatting in double brackets (so as to avoid getting a "Review Pending Please be Patient" notice:
Category:Living people Category:George Mason University faculty Category:Fellows of the American Physical Society Category:Physics educators Category:American physicists Category:Brooklyn College Alumni Category:Columbia University Alumni
However, when I add them at the foot of the draft, beneath the Authority Control, and then click on Show Preview, I don't see these categories.
Moreover, Dworzecka's page has references done according to a different technique than I did for Ehrlich. Is use of the technique in Dworzecka's page mandatory for Ehrlich's also? I was unaware of this technique until just now. 2603:6010:4E42:500:D8FC:CFB9:1B64:2873 ( talk) 20:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I made further changes to the draft document in hopes that a reviewer will approve them. Under External Links, it is *Ehrlich's* Google Scholar page, not Mason's. The sentence under Publications now refers readers to the External Links page so that they can access that Google Scholar page: a previous reviewer left the sentence incomplete.
If further work is required, then please tell me (via this talk page) what more is needed from me. I hope that will not be necessary, from both the standpoint of Ehrlich's notability and from the quality of the page itself. 2603:6010:4E42:500:9869:B813:E466:894C ( talk) 18:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
April 16, 2021: I posted the following on CommanderWaterford's talk page /info/en/?search=User_talk:CommanderWaterford#Robert_Ehrlich_%28physicist%29
Hello CommanderWaterford, On March 20, shortly after I submitted the draft for Robert Ehrlich (physicist), you declined it. The draft has undergone substantial revision, most of which I did myself. I'll be grateful if you'd take another look. Here's a link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Robert_Ehrlich_(physicist) 2603:6010:4E42:500:E014:EBE1:EAA3:8154 ( talk) 14:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
What he did was remove some information under Personal Life, and move Ehrlich's Google Scholar page to a new External Links section. But additional cleanup was still necessary. He labeled his work Initial cleanup. I thought he would return to do more, but that didn't happen.
Are you in a position to proceed with further review? And, if you won't be doing so, what else might I do to get the Ehrlich draft finalized?
More exactly, I sometimes will review a second time if it's to check added material for what I think might become a satisfactory article. But if I think that unlikely, it's fairer to the contributor if more than one person takes a look at it. In this case, the updates are sufficient, and I'm accepting it.
DGG (
talk )
23:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)