This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Okay, so now one of the best references, the one from AAA, contradicts the definition in the lede: "vehicle parts, cargo, or other material that has been unintentionally discharged from vehicles onto the roadway." -
AndrewDressel (
talk)
01:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)reply
I'm just checking on a new article to which links have been inserted into several articles that I watch. My first impression was that the subject was not notable. The new sources are a big improvement. -
AndrewDressel (
talk)
01:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Cool. I added links from various articles to give this article more relevance. I clarified the definitions of "road debris" and "road spray" too so that should allow perhaps unreferenced definitions for now anyway (since I feel they are fairly obvious) but they are related and I don't feel justify having a separate "road spray" article. What do you think? -
Eekerz (
talk)
01:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)reply
environmental consequences
The article has so far been completely environment-agnostic. Let's just assume this is due to blissful ignorance instead of active denial. Could please more contributors from the environmental WP projects have a closer look into this? -- Kku 14:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)