This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
I would be interested to see references for the assertions about the origin of the name Ouse and the previous name of Mid-wynd.
QuestingVole11:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm German and find the claim interesting that "Ouse" is supposed to be a "very common name for rivers in England". Does one other example suffice to support the assertion? Which are the other English rivers by the name of "Ouse"? I will not comment on the claim that the name is of celtic origin. Seems to me that certain people just love to see something celtic in just about everything. Is there an English term like "celtomania"? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.236.137.36 (
talk)
11:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Sussex Ouse Valley Way is a pretty thin article and, indeed, claims to follow the route of this river; in the absence of independently notable, or even interesting information, it would seem that the whole topic could be dealt with in this article.
Rodhullandemu23:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose The way apparently does not follow the river exactly and is a separate entity, so is deserving of its own article. The point of stub articles (and red links) is to encourage readers to get involved and write the text, so I don't think they should be systematically merged or deleted for tidiness sake.--
Charles (
talk)
08:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose Definitely a seperate entity which will ultimately be expanded and written about in a different way to the river. If it were merged, I'm sure it would reappear later. I have added it to the 'Hiking Project'.
Derek Andrews (
talk)
09:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I have just added archive links to one external link on
River Ouse, Sussex. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have checked the article against the criteria for B-class.
Suitably referenced, with inline citations
Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
Defined structure, with adequate lead
Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
Appropriately understandable
It currently fails on item 1, as much of the Ecology and wildlife section is unreferenced, and item 3, as the lead does not introduce the subject and summarise the main points of the article. I will leave it at C-class until these items are addressed.
Bob1960evens (
talk)
08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply