From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A poster for the film can be found on IMDb, and could be used for this article.
Red4Smash (
talk )
02:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer:
BigLordFlash (
talk ·
contribs )
16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my
talk page .
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
The prose is clear and concise, nothing to point.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
I fixed all the minor mistakes.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
It has a list of all references.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline . All content that
could reasonably be challenged , except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
All sentences have reliable sources.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
C. It contains
no original research :
No original research.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
No copyright violations (
Earwig )
BigLordFlash
talk
16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
It addresses all the main aspects.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
It stays focused on the topic.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
It's totally neutral.
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
No edit wars or content dispute.
BigLordFlash
talk
16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
No copyright issues.
BigLordFlash
talk
16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
All images are relevant and have suitable captions.
BigLordFlash
talk
16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations!
BigLordFlash
talk
13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.