This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This is a newish website, with a tenuous claim to notability (posting Trump rally videos on Youtube), but it lacks sourcing. my search of News Google turns up little
[1]. New editors want to know how to demonstrate notability: find reliable sources that discuss this website, stuff like who created and/or funds it, it's impact or unique features.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 10:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm sure Hillary Clinton and her gang would really like to know also! Kind of sucks when some nobody gets a little motivation to do a little work, and nobody has the low-down on them to keep them under the whip. Good job RSBN. --
roger (
talk) 00:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Usage
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 18 January 2021 by
Example. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
i know they have it in their name, but why don't we just say company as ref 17 does? Am I missing something?
Doug Wellertalk 20:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply