This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rhine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"At the end of World War I the Rhineland was subject to the Treaty of Versailles, which created lots of bitterness in Switzerland, and was one of the many reasons for World War II. The reoccupation of the Rhineland by Nazi Germany increased Hitler's popularity in Germany. " Is this quoted from someone's grade 10 history project? Celtic renos is credited all over the Internet as signifying "raging flow." Does it? Are there any Celtic cognates to support this reading? Here would be the entry to discuss it. (Not ignorant me, needless to say.) Wetman 22:05, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
An anonymous user has added a reference which I think may be vandalism, so I'm removing it. If it's not vandalism, please can someone clarify and restore it if necessary ? Thanks GeraldH 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
This article lists the River Meuse as being a tributary of the Rhine. Yes, there is some intermixing of the waters in the lower reaches, but the Maas (Meuse) remains a separate river with its own mouth in the Hollandsch Diep, doesn't it? One of the Rhine's mouths is the IJssel, but no Maas/Meuse water flows there, for instance. I think there should at least be a note explaining that the Maas/Meuse is a "partial tirbutary" or somesuch (is there a real word for this situation?). Perhaps it should state that the two rivers share a common delta (in the list of tributaries, I mean; it's already in the main text), rather than demoting the Maas to a mere unqualified tributary. -- Stemonitis 09:26, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
And while I'm here, wouldn't it make more sense to list all the tributaries together (noting which side they enter from), rather than separating the left-bank tributaries from the right-bank tributaries? -- Stemonitis 09:26, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There are railway bridges at Mainz and Koblenz, but I'd have to check what the nearest stations are. If someone happens to have that information to hand... Alai 04:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This article is getting to be outstanding. I can't think of any other encyclopedia that puts this info at your fingertips. Botteville 00:48, 28 September 2005 (UTC) It would be appropriate to add a section dedicated to the many legends and myths of the Rhein River. There are an abundance of books and articles on this topic that can be listed as references. The myths and legends are just as important as the history when it comes to the culture of the region.
It would be interesting if someone were to add a few paras on the use of the Rhine by commercial barge traffic. I am surprised to learn that these barges can travel when the water depth is as low as 85cm! is this right? And what are the effects of low water levels on traffic?
Bearfoot
23:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
I would also like to see some more explanation about its economical importance. Commercially it's probably Europe's most important river.
I was just wondering if there really is a need for all of the subheadings under "prehistory"; the majority of them aren't even in use. -T. Desloges (6 January 2006)
Please clarify what in fact is meant here by "before present", present in the real sense of the word or the constantly becoming more ridiculous use by geologists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.4.214.28 ( talk) 17:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to fix the geography section.
Moved Breisach from 'large cities' to the smaller ones. And even that is debattable...but considering it was somewhat historically important, I don't remove it entirely. -- Doc Tsiolkovski 16:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The subject of this article has an English language name (Rhine) and as this is the English language encyclopedia, we should use that name. Previously the article rather than arbitrarily adopted the German language name (Rhein), ignoring the fact that the river is shared between several nations, each with their own name for it. So I have changed all the occurrences I found. The exception to this is where the article is actually talking about the name of the river, where the actual name in question should be used. Ironically the only cases I found where this applied were talking about the name in the Netherlands, where Rhein is less acceptable to the locals than Rhine. So in these cases, I've changed the name to 'Rijn'. -- Chris j wood 15:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
This page should be Rhine not Rhine (river). There is no reason for the current ridiculous disambiguation page at Rhine, which reflects an American perspective. -- Grahamec 15:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Rhine (river) to Rhine as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 09:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I removed the section about the Basel pollution incident of 1986 because it was badly written, poorly sourced, and inappropriately placed; however, I suggest that the information in River Rhine Pollution: November 1986 be placed somewhere, perhaps under a section called "Pollution", "Ecology", or "Environmental History", as this info is definitely important, and there are ample online sources for this. It seems that no "Merge from" tag was added to start a discussion on this, so I'll add one. Feeeshboy 01:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I think the phrase Most Important could be a bit bias and not very encyclopedia like. Perhaps somebody should consider changing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.189.157 ( talk) 21:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree that most important is a difficult measure - however, I came here after I unsuccesfully googled 'list of rivers by population' 'list of rivers by GDP' these are the classic metrics of importance in social science. By population I would guess it would be dominated by the big Chinese rivers Yangtzee et al. the indian rivers, congo, niger, nile, mississippi, colorado, rhine and donau. Other than missing the amazon I feel this list would pretty appropriately capture most important. 1. human population lives within a days walk of the river 2. GDP by this human population 3. river biodiversity (#of species) This I feel like are good measures, that fit within the encyclopedia mindset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.93.142 ( talk) 14:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The Rhine's basin also comprises all of Luxembourg and at least the Belgian municipality of Attert plus some of the Eastern Cantons with the river Our. Also see this map. Belgium and Luxembourg belong in the list of basin countries in the upper right table. Wakari07 ( talk) 01:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
There should be something about navigation on the Rhine, including the treaties governing it. -- JensMueller ( talk) 23:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Since this is the English language encyclopedia, shouldn't the map at the top be replaced with one in English? If anyone could find one of equal/better quality in English, it would be greatly appreciated. - Supergeek1694 ( talk) 21:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed the same thing. There isn't a good map on Wikimedia Commons of the Rhine, however there is a good map of Europe that could be cropped in and the river highlighted. I do not have a Wikimedia account, but I could update the photo if someone else uploads. Here is the map http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_map_CIA_2005_large.jpg —Zujine| talk 02:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
The name of the Rhine comes from Old High German: Rhine, which, in turn, comes from Middle High German: Rin, from the Proto-Indo-European root *reie- ("to move, flow, run").[2] The Reno River in Italy shares the same etymology.
This is confusing. The chronology is wrong. It says that the Old High German name is derived from the Middle High German name. Should it not be the other way? And it should be mentioned that the "h" in "rh" is a newer, Greek imitation. -- 195.0.221.197 ( talk) 02:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
The term "River Manche" has been used to describe the Rhine's course after confluance with the Thames or the Seine during the last glaciation. Is this accurate and worth mentioning?-- 128.240.229.3 ( talk) 15:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
In the German Wikipedia there was a lively discussion from 27 to 30 January, 2010, ( http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Rhein#Ist_der_Rhein_k.C3.BCrzer_als_gedacht.3F) which led to changes in several lengths given in that article ( http://de.wikipedia.org/?title=Rhein&diff=69998827&oldid=69988227). In particular, the total length was changed from 1324 km to 1235.6 km (767.77 mi). The origin of the error is discussed in at least two newspaper articles:
Another modern online source that might be considered semi-official is from the Ministerium für Umwelt, Forsten, und Verbraucherschutz of Rheinlandpfalz ( http://www.wasser.rlp.de/servlet/is/1193/). They give a total length of 1249 km.
A number of encyclopedias also give values in this range:
The suspicion is that someone somewhere along the line accidentally changed 1230 to 1320, but the error might also be related to the longer length before "corrections" of the course made between 1817 und 1876 ( http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinbegradigung).
I corrected this article and also List_of_rivers_by_length#List_of_rivers_longer_than_1000_km. Are there still other articles where the length of the Rhine shows up?
-- Art Carlson ( talk) 11:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Why are miles preferred over kilometres in the infobox, where it's the reverse in the article?-- 345Kai ( talk) 19:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The article does not contain a single word on river navigation. How far from the mouth is the river navigable? -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 03:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I think the introductory paragraph should state where the river is (beyond just in Europe), with some-thing like either a naming of the countries it runs through or at least saying where it starts and ends or/and the country that it lies in for most of its length. Kdammers ( talk) 10:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Rhein#Abschnitte from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
The section "Sections" is a translation of the section "Abschnitte" in the German version. HansM ( talk) 19:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
The 'Middle Rhine' section currently states that "In this sections the river falls from 77.4 m above sea level to 504 m.".
I must be missing something - surely 77 to 504 is a rise, not a fall? Trafford09 ( talk) 06:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
On the volume figures given in the Rhine article, the Aar is the major tributary (more than half the volume at Basel - 500m**3, which is more than a fifth of the discharge at the Dutch border - ~ 2300m**3, and clearly more than the figure given for the Mosel). The Meuse and the Main are the only rivals, but discharge figures are not given for either. I have amended the wording of the Aar section to emphasize its discharge contribution, also to refer to te Main Neckar etc as other main tributaries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.255.103 ( talk) 21:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The article states about the confluence of Aare and Rhine: "Nevertheless, the Alpine Rhine is considered the main branch, because it is longer." This seems to me a perfect example of backward reasoning. We try to justify the present by assuming our scientific logic was also how our ancestors thought. In this case it seems very silly. Do we thing they measured the length of the Rhine in those days, to determine which was the longest branch? Off course not! And normally the branch that brings the most water is considered the main branch everywhere, not the longest branch. May I suggest 2 different reasons why the Rhine branch coming from Lake Constance was considered the main branch: 1 This is the steadier branch which in late-summer (when it matters most) is donating more water then the Aare 2 This is the branch which brings clearer water (thanks to Lake Constance being a perfect sediment trap), and rein is also the german word for clean. Maybe the linguists can tell us whether the river was also the origin of this word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.138.221.151 ( talk) 09:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately the article lacks any mention of the ecological problems in the post WW2-period and the partial ecological recovery from the 90s on. 2A02:1210:1A51:4E00:695D:E60B:DE75:F18 ( talk) 10:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)