This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
I suggest this article could do with splitting into several smaller ones, with an article about the series in general and it's history, and one article for each of the 6 seasons held so far. It is already quite unwieldy and I can only imagine it will get longer as more events are held!
Thaf (
talk)
10:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes this was my original intention, to briefly talk about each season then have an article for each. It ended up being longer though ! Will have a look at doing that when the current season has finished. Rob
Frank800 (
talk)
13:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think really those other articles need to be merged back into this one and seriously trimmed down. The main problem is the lack of references. I have no doubt that what they say is true but
verifiability is required. The problem extends, to a lesser degree, to this main article as well so there is probably some content that should be removed and so making the article more manageable with the content about each seasons merged back together.
Adambro (
talk)
19:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Article Name
Thaf please dont change the title of the article to (cycling series). I changed it to - cycling series as the brackets caused problems when they put the link on the Revolution website, the link on there will be out of date if you change it. I will change it back, please leave it. Thanks —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Frank800 (
talk •
contribs)
13:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Don't worry, the re-direct will send it to the new name automatically, there's no need to change the title on their website. The title needs brackets to conform will all the other article naming conventions.
Thaf (
talk)
13:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply