This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone point out a source for this?
Taiwan probably possesses some amount of sarin.
The briefest of searches on the Internet will reveal a half dozen sources. Stargoat 19:54, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This is incorrect...
Taiwan does not have any indigenous capability to enrich uranium or produce plutonium. Now if you would argue that Taiwan has the technological level to develop a nuclear program, that's something quite different, and you need to rephrase.
Taiwan undoubtedly possesses the technology to enrich uranium, if not the capacity at present. It isn't that hard to do and they were looking into it during the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s.
Roadrunner 19:01, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I had previously written a more extensive discussion of the nuclear weapons program at Military_of_Taiwan#Nuclear_weapons_program. Should it be moved here? -- Jia ng 05:34, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Splits are en editorial decision that don't require a RM. Jenks24 ( talk) 07:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Republic of China and weapons of mass destruction →
Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction – This article only deals with Taiwan and not not pre-1949 Republic of China and Wikipedia guidelines say use Taiwan
C. 22468
Talk to me
16:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.This is starting to look like a repeat of what happened in the last few days at Hsiung Feng III, with disruptive editing by the same IP-based editor. That page is now Page Protected. There is no point in leaving messages on his/her talk page, because the IP address keeps changing. merlinVtwelve ( talk) 23:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)