![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This entire page seems a bit partial to the firm and not necessarily a NPOV. It seems as though it was written either by an firm insider or affiliate, or very eager fan. It should be neutralized. Any thoughts? ButtonwoodTree 15:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Trying to clean up the article. If I hatchet too much, please let me know. R.Vinson ( talk) 23:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm not finding any references for the Renaissance Technologies#Noted instruments noted instruments setction. Will remove tomorrow unless someone has refrences to contribute. R.Vinson ( talk) 17:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
I have removed some spamming.
A Bloomberg article says that Simons's mathematical heavy hitters are figuring out whether "palladium" futures will rise or fall. The world-wide market in palladium is very thin, about 10 or 20 lots a day. One lot of Pd is 100 Troy ounces. The price of palladium is about $294 per Troy oz.
Nathaniel Simons seems to be the son of Jim Simons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 ( talk) 16:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
It should be made clear that the Medallion Fund is not open to the public and mostly acts for the managers of Renaissance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.11.202 ( talk) 13:11, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
The phrase "tech pro" is vague. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.109.117 ( talk) 17:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
It is not true that reid barton is working for rentec. IF someone know for 100% that he is still employed at the fund please let me know otherwise I am forced to remove him Simonzimbad ( talk) 16:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
This article is full of spam from Simons and his paid PR men. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.215.180 ( talk) 10:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
There is plenty of information about Simons and the like at zerohedge. Dealings with Madoff are mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.120.147 ( talk) 15:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC) See www.zerohedge.com for 18/6/2015, also known as 6/18/2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.120.147 ( talk) 15:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
I have dealt with some paid spam.
I linked to this article thinking is was about, duh, technology during the Renaissance. Should not the name be "Renaissance Technologies LLC"? Seligne ( talk) 10:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
"From 1994 through mid-2014 it averaged a 71.8% annual return."
No this is wrong, the chart shows something else! It should be below 71.8%! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.178.152.203 ( talk) 21:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
If the Medallion Fund is really a black box, for all we know, it could just as well be a ponzi scam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.224.35.72 ( talk) 09:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
As far as I know, the Medallion fund is not a black box. IIRC James Simons said in an interview that the model is very complicated, but humans can still understand it. Its about 16 pages long, with more pages added as time goes on, which is not what a black box is. I'll try to find the source for this, then we can remove that claim from this page. 87.150.88.212 ( talk) 07:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)