From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Ruby2010 (
talk ·
contribs )
23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
Will review soon.
Ruby
2010/
2013
23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Add wikilinks for characters in plot
Not a fan of the image box; the images don't look good side by side, and the formatting doesn't quite fit the box template
Identify that Carter is series creator in production section
You repeat CBS is the network for Fences twice in the production section; you can just mention CBS the second time (and get rid of the second wikilink)
Executive Producer -> Executive producer
Identify Wong as a producer (or whatever his title is)
mixed-to-negative -> mixed to negative
Creative if convoluted -> creative if convoluted
"Red Museum' tries..." Is the ' a typo on your part, or the authors?
✗ Not done
Ruby
2010/
2013
00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
This link doesn't go where you'd like it to (find a different url?)
Italicize and add wikilink to Entertainment Weekly , and add date (ref 4)
✗ Not done
Ruby
2010/
2013
00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
Use consistent date formatting (9 December 2011 vs December 9, 2011 for example)
Unitalicize Critical Myth (it's a website, not a print source)
On hold for seven days while above comments get addressed. Please respond here when you have finished. Thanks,
Ruby
2010/
2013
01:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
OK, I believe I've fixed everything. Tell me how it looks!--
Gen. Quon (
talk )
15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
Hate to be a stickler, but the above two still need fixing.
Ruby
2010/
2013
00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
Whoops! Sorry I missed those. OK, they're all fixed now.--
Gen. Quon (
talk )
04:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reply
No worries! As all comments have been addressed, I am passing this one for GA. Nice work,
Ruby
2010/
2013
05:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reply