![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's fucking wrong...wrong. Horrible translation. Someone please fix it.
Why don't you fix it if you know what it should be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.133.12 ( talk) 13:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
"something religious"? that's a pretty vague description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.72.252 ( talk) 05:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Agreed - I just watched the film and the plot description as it stands, while by and large correct, is very poorly written. It feels less like a bad translation and more like it was written by a teen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.113.62 ( talk) 06:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Recently, this movie title has become expanded to match the sequels: REC 2: Fear Revisited. ( Keithbaker ( talk) 16:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC))
Yes, good notion. Sort of like what happened to Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope as the franchise extends itself. ( Keithbaker ( talk) 17:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC))
Here is an example specimen: http://www.shockya.com/news/2011/08/08/dvd-review-rec-2-fear-revisited/ ( Keithbaker ( talk) 17:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC))
It turned out to be just a flushing of the stylized title out of IMDb system since people couldn't find the film's page within the database, not a retitling of the film. 24.19.230.53 ( talk) 14:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Happy it's still "[Rec] 2", Thank you. 206.188.38.230 ( talk) 20:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:REC (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 12:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)