This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
dinosaurs and
dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support: Per the discussion at
WT:DINO, in an attempt to streamline the organization of higher-order clades, these merges are proposed for the following reasons:
The articles to be merged are stubs.
The articles to be merged are node-based clades with very little independent content that could be added in the foreseeable future to expand them. (
WP:N)
All of the information in these two articles are relevant to discussion of rebbachisaurid classification, which is already covered by the article
Rebbachisauridae. (
WP:REDUNDANT)
"Rebbachisauridae" has over 450 results on google scholar vs only 11 for "Khebbashia" and 22 for "Rebbachisaurinae". In fact, a search for "Rebbachisaurinae" will return, "Did you mean 'Rebbachisauridae'?". (
WP:N)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.