![]() | The contents of the Rat Bastard Protective Association page were merged into Bruce Conner on 22 December 2012 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Bruce Conner. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This is the introductory article about an important, esoteric, counter-cultural organization in San Francisco, California. More information to follow shortly -- thank you.
Image:Bruce-conner-rolls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:2002 rpba edict 01.22.2002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ratbastard seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
There is no question that the Rat Bastard Protective Association is significant and notable.
There is, however, not one shred of reliable evidence I can find to substantiate any activity by the group since the mid-1960s. The only possible source of this information is a personal website by an individual who claims to have some association with the group even though he was born a decade after the group was formed. On a range of levels everything in this article after the first paragraph fails WP:V. Debate ( talk) 05:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
My many concerns which discount any all negative claims have not been addressed or met. Why not? because they cannot be refuted. Therefore, I will assume ALL NEGATIVE CLAIMS BY THE ABOVE cannot be addressed, hence are VALID.
Additionally, you do not understand the word research: according to websters, research is to make an extensive investigation into: to research a matter thoroughly.
The document provided is NOT research, nor produced by said 'person' or website. It is a document, period. Moreover, it is an official document by the Association. Clearly done post 1965, period -- refuting ALL CLAIMS by harrasing agent.
Next, please do not restate your concerns but address my rebuttal which clearly proves ignorance and harassment. Please move on and quit harassment. -- Art4em ( talk) 18:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)