A fact from Ras Burqa massacre appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the
mentally illEgyptian policeman who perpetrated the Ras Burqa massacre, killing seven
Israeli tourists, including four children, was hailed in the Egyptian opposition press as a national hero?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on
terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
For such a sensitive subject, this article needs more detailed references - where were mass demonstrations held? How many turned up? Which opposition papers lauded the killings? Otherwise, it reads badly and a bit sensationalist. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
194.176.105.39 (
talk)
16:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC).reply
I agree. The article seems a little one sided at this point and the citations could be seen as painting a fairly biased picture of Muslim opinion about the event.
Enordgren20:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Well not really missing anything specifically, it just seems to have a certain tone. The article, for the most part, focuses on anti-semitic reactions to the event. There's only two sentences that seem to note that there was a reaction in the Islamic world that sympathized with those people who died. I don't know enough about this specific issue to know if this weighting represents the reality accurately, but greater variance in sources could bring the article to a different (possibly more neutral) picture of the reaction. It's a very sensitive subject, and it just isn't great if it comes of as sensationalist.
Enordgren21:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Maybe you're surprised to learn about these reactions to the killings of Israelis; I'm not. It's just the tip of the iceberg of vilification and dehumanization of the Jews that are occurring in the Muslim world on the daily basis.
BeitOr21:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
This isn't the place to start bringing in personal opinions on matters far beyond the scope of this article. Enodgren was just trying to say that all reactions should be included if possible in order to provide a balanced history of what happened.
Joshdboz21:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
The problem is that you don't seem to have any evidence of reactions excluded. You just postulate their existence.
BeitOr21:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Well, as I said, I don't have the best knowledge of this specific event. I just thought that additional sources could add to the balance of the article. I thought you might know of more sources, since you wrote the original article. I will not postulate any further. Sorry if I offended you...didn't mean to.
Enordgren22:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Describing Ras Burqa as "the place" baffles me more than helps me. Is it a village? A neighborhood? A campground? An empty field next to a road? The opening paragraph would read much better if those two words were dropped & the last half of the sentence simply read "in Ras Burqa, a part of the district of Nuwaiba in Sinai." --
llywrch17:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Was he insane? On what evidence?
The article assumes that the killer was insane. On what evidence? What was his diagnosis. The article should state, instead, that "authorities claimed that he was mentally ill."
Scott Adler22:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
It would have been nice if the pre-existing article
Suleiman Khater had been taken into account before this article was started. By the way, "Khatir" may be more technically correct according to Classical Arabic transcription conventions, but "Khater" seems to be more common in the English-language press...
AnonMoos00:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Motivations
There is nothng that suggests the man was acting out of hatred for Jews, motivated by religion (Islam) nor is there anything that says that he acting on behalf of some Islamist group.
Bless sins08:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Can somebody please point to where a reliable source states "anti-Semitism" is related to the Ras Burqa massacre. Secondly, can somebody point to a source that says the Ras Burqa massacre was either motivated by or caused "Islam"ic anti-Semitism.
Bless sins14:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)reply
And since when is "Lewis" the De-facto authority? In fact, I see ^Lewis 233 in the citations, but I can't actually see any information linked. Fake citation?
The entire article has such a sensationalist bias with trying to turn it into an antisemitism factor, right down to the links at the end "see also section" The "see also" section should be linking to similar massacres, not to antisemitism.
The Fact remains that he was a soldier (Not a policeman, the CSF in Egypt are conscripts)in charge of guarding a specific location. The defense clearly stated that, and the Egyptian government agreed. Some of the "reactions" you've listed, are no more than excerpts taken out of context, as some of them were in reference to the claim by Khater that "I was given orders not to allow anyone to pass, and i followed my orders and for that i'm being punished" , instead you've given the reactions an antisemitism vibe. Where are the quotes by Khater's family? The quotes by his defense? The fact that he turned himself in directly after it happened?
This article is not fair or balanced in the slightest. As such, it SHOULD be merged or at least more data linked from the Suleman Khater article, such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suleiman_Khater#Investigations_with_Suleiman , when you're a solider you listen to your orders and do your job, your religious or personal views don't come into play, and there is absolutely NOTHING besides the media reaction later on, that would hint in the slightest that Khater did so because of antisemitism.
(
98.233.38.29 (
talk)
20:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC))reply
Maybe, though I don't think that's a reason to keep it. The
Ras Burqa massacre article is quite a bit longer and more detailed, and Khater himself is only known for the massacre, so I'd say it is not necessary to have a rather short article about him that is not likely to be expanded a lot in the future anyway. (
Lord Gøn (
talk)
16:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC))reply
It's absolutely and verifiably true that the Khater article existed quite a bit before this one did, but I wasn't arguing that that was a reason to keep the Khater article -- just explaining how the situation came about...
AnonMoos (
talk)
20:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, ok, I still propose merging them though. I don't care, if the one is merged into the other, or the other way round, but having two articles about the subject seems very unnecessary to me. (
Lord Gøn (
talk)
21:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC))reply
The Suleiman Khater article can have all kinds of biography categories not really appropriate for this article, while this article has incident categories maybe not appropriate for the Suleiman Khater article...
AnonMoos (
talk)
12:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Maybe, but there aren't any, and it doesn't look as if they would emerge in the not too distant future. It seems there isn't that much information out there about Khater's life and motives, so massive expansion of the article seems very unlikely to me. (
Lord Gøn (
talk)
17:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC))reply
I guess I've misundertood you here. I assume you are talking about
categories, while I was talking about section headings. Don't know how that came to my mind. BTW the categories could remain. Merging is not the same as deleting. I'd simply create a redirect and keep all the categories that are not overlapping. (22:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC))
Merging the articles is OK except for the fact that it gives way too much face time to the murderer. My attempt to include the names of the victims long ago was deleted. That is unacceptable. --
Gilabrand (
talk)
05:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I personally don't have anything against naming the victims, though if possible all of them should be listed, including the Egyptian policeman. And I wouldn't be afraid that the merging will give Khater "too much face time", as there isn't that much to merge anyway. (
Lord Gøn (
talk)
16:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC))reply
Deletion of survivor's testimony
Attempts to delete the sole survivor's testimony, properly sourced, will not be tolerated. They show exactly where the "editor's" POV lies. An article about a murder is not just a showcase for the views of the murderer and his supporters. --
Gilabrand (
talk)
04:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Iranian stamp and street name
For a trippy experience, go to Hebrew Wikpedia (
he:Image:Solayman.jpg, or with English-language interface
here) and see the 1986 Iran stamp in his honor. If someone felt like filling in all the tedious multiple redundant fair use paperwork, this could be copied over to en.wikipedia. Also, do a
simple Google search to see evidence of of the street named for him in Tehran...
AnonMoos (
talk)
12:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)reply
File:Suleiman Khater.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,
File:Suleiman Khater.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
I find the wording of this section to be quite biased. The opening sentence "Egyptian opposition politicians hailed Khatir as "hero of Sinai" for committing the massacre of Israelis" sounds particularly agitprop, let alone being erroneous. While opposition politicians in Egypt may have hailed Khater as a hero, it would have been for reasons along the lines of "defending the borders of his country against trespassers" and/or due to Khater's "mysterious murder;" and certainly not for shooting and killing civilians. The section as a whole should be rewritten to be more descriptive of the aftermath on the Egyptian side rather than just being emotionally rhetorical. -
Estr4ng3d (
talk)
22:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ras Burqa massacre. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.