This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
GF vs. TRF
I have reworked the article to put more emphasis on the Grand Forks arena. I think the average person using Wikipedia to get information about "Ralph Engelstad Arena" is looking for information about the Grand Forks facility. The Thief River Falls facility, while certainly worthy of sharing this article with its bigger brother, is clearly much less prominent and, unlike the Grand Forks arena, virtually unheard of outside of the region.
MatthewUND 07:37, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
pic
I like the new picture, but could that one be included somewhere a ways down in the article and a pic that more prominently features the building itself used as the one for the infobox? It seems a little odd to have such a prominent pic of the building's sign in the infobox when the building itself is what is being described. --
MatthewUND(
talk)23:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Missing Image of Fighting Sioux
Someone with a totally inappropriate POV has been deleting the Fighting Sioux logo from this and other websites. I don't have time to re-insert but someone should. The incredible boldness of these people is unbelievable. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Elcajonfarms (
talk •
contribs)
You're right, the image has been deleted because it did not have a detailed fair use claim associated with it. I will add the logo again in the future and I will fill out the fair use claim. I agree that the article is missing something without the logo. --
MatthewUND(
talk)06:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Logos are prohibited on other articles then the team article. The user who removed it from this article was just following wiki-policy. --
Krm50008:00, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
While what you say is basically true, the main reason this logo was removed from this and other articles was because it did not have a full fair use rationale for being used in each of those articles. --
MatthewUND(
talk)09:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
NPOV dispute
This article seems to violate the Wikipedia Neutral Point of View guidelines. Additionally, it contains numerous unverified claims. Please add citations to any claims currently missing them.
Afeickert01:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)0reply
The article was lacking sources, but I'm not sure that there were too many NPOV problems. Regardless, I have cleaned up the article and added a number of sources. --
MatthewUND(
talk)05:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)reply
I think that USA Today article about the Nickname controversy is biased against nickname supporters and UND (and the supposed "poisonous atmosphere" there)