This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (it is created for a legitimate person and everything on the page is factual information, which can be supported by links and credible sources) -- MargieSernik ( talk) 16:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The fact that a person exists does not make them worthy of encyclopedic inclusion. See: WP:GNG and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Specto73 ( talk) 17:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
There's a certain promotional tone to the article but I don't think it is insurmountable. Likewise I don't think it was fair to remove the reference list. Some of them may not meet WP:RS but others like Washington Exec probably do.
For the sake of giving this article a fair shake, here is the removed reverence list for individual evaluation and return to the article as appropriate:
Extended content
|
---|
https://backchannel.com/the-hacking-of-hollywood-51c25895512f#.ln9ifvhdf - http://www.thewrap.com/bbc-site-online-attack-streaming-services-shut-down/ http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-celebrity-cybersecurity-20160601-snap-story.html http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/are-we-too-trusting-with-technology--509332035621 https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153878636952501&set=a.165326572500.152451.715062500&type=1 http://www.communitynewspapers.com/brickell/once-a-teenage-hacker-he-now-is-a-consultant-for-films/ http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/tip/Beyond-HIPAA-Next-generation-patient-data-security-threats https://tribecafilm.com/festival/events/tribeca-talks-secrecy-power http://www.wnyc.org/story/hacker-and-spy/ http://www.sloansummit2014.org/science-entertainment-exchange-presents-art-science/ http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2014/11/a-foundations-edge-in-science.html http://www.papermag.com/2014/03/sxsw_interactive_activity.php http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-sony-hacking-cost-20141205-story.html http://www.wired.com/brandlab/2015/05/chilling-scenarios-keep-privacy-security-experts-night/ http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/06/64008 http://www.wehatemalware.com/hackers-issue-terror-threats-to-theaters-showing-the-interview/ https://www.yahoo.com/movies/bp/burning-studios-protect-films-internet-hackers-191550364.html http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/state-control-filmmakers-china-hackers-434874 http://thirdcertainty.com/spwnr/i-recognize-that-face-and-so-does-facebook/ http://lasvegassun.com/vegasdeluxe/2013/aug/02/q-ralph-ethical-hacker-echemendia-talks-snowden-fe/ http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cyber-security-experts-question-north-802697? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/turnstyle/this-man-says-hollywood-d_b_7588194.html http://www.prweb.com/releases/theethicalhacker/hollywood/prweb11306460.htm http://gtra.org/off-the-record-ep-1-ralph-echemendia-the-ethical-hacker/
http://cocalecas.net/2015/05/hacker-cinematografic-entrevista-a-ralph-echemendia/ |
Crow Caw 17:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
@ GB fan Excuse me? I did not remove anything from the article, nor did I nominate it for BLPPROD. As you would know if you had actually read the edit history, all I did was nominate it for speedy deletion and add accurate tags. Regards, Specto73 ( talk) 17:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Editors, I thought my last update shored up a few of the facts and gave a bit more evidence to Echmendia's notability. Please highlight the areas you consider insubstantial, advertorial or not notable and I'll fix them. Thanks! Manc1234 ( talk) 00:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)