This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Outdated
Calling all editors of this article including
User:Superastig who have edited the episodes section. Is this article going to be outdated just because
User:Kutingko and
User:Raisingmamaygma keep adding the same questionable external links? Kutingko and Raisingmamaygma are completely unresponsive in this matter and have resorted to unconstructive edits,just to keep the external links in the article.
TheHotwiki (
talk)
16:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)reply
My
recent edit on the episode lists is the updated one. I have no idea as to why those users keep reverting them back to the 52nd episode. I suggest that they should be blocked indefinitely for their disruptive edits and the page should be semi-protected from unconfirmed/IP users. ASTIG️🙃(
ICE-T •
ICE CUBE)10:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Protected edit request on 17 August 2022 (2)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The article should be reverted to this version.
[1], which restored the final episode of the series.
User:Kutingko and
User:Raisingmamaygma keep adding the same external links for no valid reason, and didn't help the article at all. I also suggest the administrators to review the edit history of those editors.
TheHotwiki (
talk)
22:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Done I have completed this request, acknowledging that the dispute around whether this version should be on the page was the primary reason why this page was protected (
Stwalkster and
MSGJ for courtesy). I note the fact the other two editors have not discussed this in the two weeks since the protection was put in place and that they have not contested this edit request in the week it's been in place.
Izno (
talk)
21:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)reply