This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article has been classified as relating to
neuroanatomy.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 October 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
CJAmbrose,
Nicole Wolard.
"the content of glycogen granules or the expression of the astrocyte-specific glutamate transporter or the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). " These are glial properties? If so, should we find some references and then put it into the
glial cell article?
Keith Galveston (
talk)
02:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)reply
I have doubts whether this new material belongs in the article, mainly because I find it very difficult to tell whether the sources are reputable, or whether this is a
fringe theory.
Looie496 (
talk)
04:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)reply
I can find only one citation of the dissertation,
here but can't access it. The dissertation itself seems to have been translated into English
here. If that is the only English language scholarly notice taken of the theory, mention in this article is premature and fails our
reliable sources and
weight policies and guidelines. --
Anthonyhcole (
talk)
06:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The dissertation itself seems to have been translated into English
here. This is clearly not "Dissertations: A Survey of Selected Recent Theses Relevant to Combating Aging" of Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey!!!
...or whether this is a
fringe theory. More likely than not, but only up to 2009-2010.
If that is the only English language scholarly notice taken of the theory,........Well, not only in English, write scientific articles.
I think that "Reverted edits by AM Borman" is not substantiation.
If you want to put text into a Wikipedia bio-medical article, other editors need to be able to check the sources you cite. This is a limitation of Wikipedia, due to its unique (anonymous volunteer) quality control system. Your text can be returned to this article if you can provide English language peer-reviewed journal articles or textbooks that evaluate the theory. The policy governing this is
WP:MEDRS. This is not a criticism of the theory, it is a limitation of Wikipedia which frequently prevents the very latest research and thought from getting into the encyclopedia. --
Anthonyhcole (
talk)
15:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)reply
I have read
WP:MEDRS very carefully. It is no the language restrictions. (?)
Almost all primary, secondary, and tertiary sources are on-line. (?)