This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Rachel Lloyd be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
I manually reverted the censored edits and deletion of references by User:MeditationSpace.
1. MeditationSpace is a professional affiliate of Rachel Lloyd apparent through inclusion of her name, along with original research in the edits that were made. This presents a conflict of interest. While there are times that edits can be made by an individual with a conflict of interest, this conflict must, nevertheless, be declared. Additionally, edits must be accompanied by reliable secondary and third-party publications and sources appropriate for BLP.
2. I removed "crystal ball" content regarding Lifetime movie and autobiography. When the film is broadcast and the book is published, those items should be re-added to this article.
3. I removed undue content regarding the programs and services of the organization founded by Lloyd. This information is best appropriate for the organization's article. I also diffused general content of the organization, not appropriate for BLP. Cindamuse ( talk) 01:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Today I received an email on my personal Facebook account identified as coming from Rachel Lloyd. The author disclosed that she has been making edits to the article. She expressed her concerns over her article being edited by others and reverted to poorly sourced and inaccurate material. The essence of the message is the following:
I've chosen to respond here rather than perpetuate conversation on Facebook regarding edits on Wikipedia. Additionally, edits on Wikipedia involve more than just one editor. This is a group effort. Any number of editors can and will add content to any article.
Regarding this article, while I understand the concerns, editors on Wikipedia are compelled to offer the truth. Unfortunately, presenting the truth may not always display us in the best possible light. It is not acceptable to remove sources or sourced material simply because the subject objects to it. If an incident or part of the subject's life is notable, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. Such is the case with the personal background included in the Rachel Lloyd article.
I have revised the lede to introduce Lloyd as a survivor rather than simply a prostitute. However, Wikipedia requires articles to present lede information indicating why the subject is notable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Thorough biographies include a summary of the subject's background or life prior to the reference of notability. The childhood and "war story" is applicable to the article and notability of Lloyd. The background forms the basis for the current life and measure of notability.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that offers articles based on reliable secondary and third-party sources. Contentious material about a living person can be removed if unsourced or poorly sourced. Sources provided for the Rachel Lloyd article are reliable. There is no validity to questioning the integrity of The Queens Courier, The Daily Telegraph, The Washington Times, or any of the other sources used.
We cannot include content that is based on primary sources. This includes information received from either the official website, or the representative or subject of the article. Information offered in this manner must be backed up by and attributed to reliable secondary and third party sources. Additionally, we cannot include original research, that is, information that is not already published by reliable sources.
Please know that the information included in the article is not "my" version of the life of Rachel Lloyd, but rather the information compiled from reliable sources. I have not included personal commentary or opinions in the article. That said, I have removed:
I have added content regarding accomplishments, as well as additional sources throughout the article to ensure continuity and verifiability.
Additional reading:
When you find inaccurate information, please post a message here on this talk page. If accurate information can be attributed to reliable sources, an editor will be able to make the appropriate change. Honestly, most editors here are on Wikipedia in order to help, rather than harm. That is certainly my goal. If I knew of something on any article that I knew was wrong, I would probably be the first to delete it. As far as Facebook, I have no problem with people contacting me there. However, if someone wants to discuss issues regarding Wikipedia, it is best to maintain the flow of information and include all interested Wikipedians in the conversation. I wouldn't want to leave anyone out. Respect and regards, Cindamuse ( talk) 01:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Dear Cindamuse
We see that you reverted back the changes we made the introduction paragraph to Rachel Lloyd's bio. We changed it to the below and have added sources. There are no original reliable sources that use the phrase British Business Executive and memoirist and abolitionist.
Rachel Lloyd (born 1975) is the Founder and CEO Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://www.gems-girls.org/about/our-team/our-founder, author and anti human-trafficking advocate Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ij_6iMi9gA She is known for her work advocating for commercially sexually exploited and domestically trafficked girls and young women.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://www.nywf.org/cwb2013-honoree-bios/ She immigrated to the US in 1997 and began working to end domestic sex trafficking, primarily focusing on addressing the commercial sexual exploitation of children and young women.
Additionally here are some other sources that refer to her has Founder and CEO http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/media-center/podcasts/voices-field-rachel-lloyd
We understand your desire that Wikipedia pages contain truthful and accurate information, so please accept these changes to correct current descriptors that are not accurate or sourced correctly. 71.249.196.29 ( talk) 18:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Bindu Balan Development and Communications Director - Girls Educational and Mentoring Services
Cindy,
Thank you for your comments. I understand that Wiki has a certain set of rules it must follow in order to keep accounts from being self promoting and etc. While I do not have a desire to control this page, I do just as you do, want to ensure its accuracy. I have one question, the use of British Business Executive, can I ask where you sourced that from? British Business Executive is an exaggeration, which does not appear to follow the codes of conduct you have previously sent us. I've added in another article that I think would be considered a reliable source.
Rachel Lloyd (born 1975) is a British born advocate, author and founder and CEO of Girls Educational and Mentoring Services. She is known for her work advocating for the abolition of commercial sexual exploitation and domestic trafficking of girls and young women. Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/01/24/girls-for-sale-rachel-lloyd-human-trafficking-exploitation/ Thank you for assistance with this matter.
71.249.196.29 (
talk)
13:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Bindu
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Lloyd. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)