From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acceptance

I think the org has inherent notability. I also think the community is the pace for the rough edges to be knocked off. Thus I have decided to accept to despite somewhat imperfect referencing Fiddle Faddle 20:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Added in reputable sources and removed photo

I was able to locate 4 reputable sources and add them into the article. Also I removed the photo as it might distract from the content of RW3. Snagle77 ( talk) 14:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC) reply

It would be great if someone could add in a thumbnail for the this page in the mobile search. - Example - /info/en/?search=Help:Mobile_access#/media/File:Firefox_for_Mobile_38.0.5_on_Android_2.3.6_showing_Wikipedia_search_box_suggestions.png Snagle77 ( talk) 14:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Some New Additions to Awards

RW3 was recently voted the best in category provider of retail execution solutions and a the customer satisfaction leader of CRM in the annual 2016 CGT readers poll. Snagle77 ( talk) 14:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I don't feel so good about this. This page has already been tagged for being written like an advertisement. I don't think adding more awards is going to help solve that problem. I'm going to say decline, but you can ask for a second opinion if you wish. Altamel ( talk) 02:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply