![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone replaced Image:Soviet super test.jpg with Image:Rsd_37_nuclear_test.JPG. This may be good and wonderful, but I put an unsourced tag on Image:Rsd_37_nuclear_test.JPG, as it has no source (insert usual wikipedia blather about unsourced images). Any help here before we scream "delete!"?
dino 18:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Uh, yeah... that's a picture of Tsar Bomba, not RDS-37. 99.247.26.159 17:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
what does "real" (staged) mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.94.13.57 ( talk) 23:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
The article states "but was more similar to a "boosted" fission bomb than a megaton range hydrogen bomb.", while this test was infact in the megaton range, i think it was 1.45m, while the full deployed weapon was supposed to yield 3mton. This particular line needs to be rewritten, as this was infact a megaton range weapon, it just didnt use a staged design.
Wims (
talk)
19:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Skylab1995.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Rsd 37 nuclear test.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
This sounds as though it was a Russian translation issue. Standard English wording is "explosion" or "detonation" and it should be changed throughout. Cancun ( talk) 15:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I've tried to make some improvements to the EN in the "Important Results" section, but the third para is very badly drafted in a journalistic style. Much of it doesn't say anything useful, and sometimes it is almost comical. I suggest deletion. "The thermonuclear weapons race between the United States and the Soviet Union exceeded all expectations set out before the scientists who took part. Two countries creating thermonuclear weapons with such energy yields from two different design methods proved to be the crowning achievement for science in the 1950s" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theeurocrat ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
I now learned from a video that the test lead to 2 fatalities, a soldier and a little girl. I didn't see it mentioned here. -- Slow Phil ( talk) 14:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)